• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not really

    It’s a country that was attacked by Hezbollah, and is trying to take them out with as little civilian casualties as possible

    I don’t think there are many countries that would just sit back and take it because they can’t accept any collateral

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is as little civilian casualties as possible for you? I disagree with that evaluation.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        3000 hits and 2 kids dead? Those are solid stats compared with ‘conventional’ attacks and especially with those from Hezbollah

        • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          That the other 3000 hits are Hezbollah people is said by the Israel army, which is not exactly known for being truthful regarding non israelian civilian casualties, to say it in a neutral way.

          The kids are especially put in the foreground of the discussion because they are definitely innocent. For any regular middle age man? Fat chance when the IDF even says schools and hospitals are terrorist buildings. They just call them terrorist, because they only kill terrorist. You got killed? Means you were a terrorist.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Info that those hit were by far and large Hezbollah members is also coming from journalists on the ground. Speculating that Hezbollah distributed these pagers to anyone but their members is wishful thinking on the part of those that want to convince themselves

            • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Can you give me a link to articles from the journalists on the ground please, I’m not doubting you, I just haven’t seen them myself yet. I only saw articles which reference officials from both sides (which doesn’t really mean anything between Hezbollah and Israel)

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’m doubting them. The IDF always lies and this person is defending a genocidal country and terrorist, ethnostate. It’s like giving Nazis the benefit of the doubt. But I’d also be curious to see these articles of proof that everyone killed was Hezbollah. The pictures I saw before showed lot of collateral damage and I doubt the two children were Hezbollah. This method of attack is very fire and forget, there’s no way they have that info unless they have journalists at every hospital asking if the people coming in with blown off hands are Hezbollah.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Here’s one example:

                The explosions maimed many Hezbollah members, according to footage from hospitals reviewed by Reuters. Wounded men had injuries of varying degrees to the face, missing fingers and gaping wounds at the hip where the pagers were likely worn.

                There’s also footage of some of them going off. Together with the reports of people with missing fingers (holding the pagers) and the relative low number of casualties vs the number of affected devices show that the explosive force was rather limited. It would be extremely unlikely that these devices, distributed to those that needed to be securely reachable by Hezbollah, caused many collateral damage.

                • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  First: thank you for providing the article!

                  But that is not what you claimed earlier. Reuters specifically doesn’t claim they are or are not Hezbollah members. Just that they saw videos of hurt people.

                  Just to make my stand point clear: I don’t mean that this attack mostly attacked civilians, I just don’t think we are at a level of information yet, where the full broadness of the attack is clear. If it really would be 2 innocent on 3000 hits, then yes, that would a “good” number.

                  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    If you expect journalists to verify who is and who’s not affiliated with Hezbollah at the hospital doors I hope you understand that that’s just an impossible bar to clear.

                    But if you Occam’s razor that bitch, it’s just statistically impossible that so many men and not women and children would be injured or dead, with these kind of injuries, if it were any different. There’s plenty of footage where you can see the force of the blast.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The reasons why this is such a big f’g deal are many.

      First, this IS textbook terrorism. An entire country full of civilians is paralyzed with fear of any item blowing up at any moment. In addition to the killing and maiming, this is deliberate.

      Second, Mossad is innovating new theaters of warfare. Others will imitate this. This further legitimizes any place – hospitals, schools, houses of warship – as legitimate venues for bombing. And that includes in the US.

      Third, this is ANOTHER escalation! Most of us don’t want a giant regional war! And yet people act like Hezbollah was so provocative that they gave Israel no choice. Netanyahu is clearly the instigator! Hezbollah is actually in a terrible place to fight a war. They do not want this, but feel constantly compelled to maintain their credibility. They have repeatedly taken a minimalist approach because they really don’t want to fight this war. This could end instantly if Israel just accepted a ceasefire in Gaza. Ironically, Israel is escalating in Lebanon because there is basically nothing left to blow up in Gaza and Netanyahu needs a constant war to stay out of jail. The claim that this is to let residents in the north go home is the same as the claim that the war in Gaza was to bring back hostages. A year later, ask the kibbutzim how that worked out.

      All of this is common knowledge in Israel. The head of the military is about to be replaced for repeatedly stating that all of this is contrary to Israel’s security!

      It’s just insane.

      • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bruh… Chill… Hezbollah is launching rocket indiscriminately at civilians, Israël is carefully choosing its target with these device. Average lebanese dont give a fuck about this, they want Hezbollah to get the fuck back in Iran and want a normal and not corrupted government… Thats all. They fear much more about their own country going deeper into the shit and another accident due to poor government control (like Beirut harbour explosion), than Israël commiting surgical strike near them (most of lebanese see the death of this douchbag as a good news).

        And its not an escalation, assassination of high ranked dickheads of Hezbollah/Hamas/Iran has always been their creed. It was like this before Netty, it will be the case after, and until no other threats to Israel exist (So basically until Iran political implosion).

        Netty and his braindead settlers are only opportunists of a war between Israël and Iran that never ended. But the situation would have been the same if Netty never existed…

          • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Much careful than sending randomly launched rocket on civilian… All the victims were from Hezbollah or related to them. Hezbollah representative in Lebanon is the one responsible for his son death, his choice of hatred and war is what lead to his son death…

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why doesn’t Hezbollah try not firing on Israel? Turns out when they do, Israel doesn’t strike back. I think it’s stupid to think Hezbollah should be free to attack Israel but any response is ‘escalation’. If you’re serious that you don’t want war rule n°1 should be: don’t start shooting rockets at them

        • Andy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is such a weird, unproductive observation that people make all the time.

          First: my point is that we in the US should recognize that Israel’s actions are making the US and Israel less safe. It would definitely be nice if Hezbollah stopped fighting, but that is essentially a non-sequitur. It’s not a counter argument that what Mossad did is a good idea that any of us should support.

          Second: this observation that they could end the war by not fighting is true of every side in every war. Russia could end their war in Ukraine if they stopped invading. Ukraine could end the war if they surrendered and let Russia invade them. Hezbollah and Israel could both end this war by not fighting it. What practical guidance does that provide?

          I’m not interested in watching this like a history channel documentary. When I type, I’m expressing what I think we should all say and do as people with (supposedly) the ability to influence our governments. I don’t have control over Hezbollah. I don’t really have control over Israel or the US either, but at least I’m supposed to.