Google is weakening ad blockers as part of their MV3 extension standard and this will trickle down into all Chromium browsers. Built in ad blockers lack features compared to uBlock Origin as well.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Or use UBO-Lite? MV3 has some limitations but I’m tired of people acting like it ruins ad blocking when it doesn’t.

    • unhappy.termite@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Afaik, UBO lite only updates filter lists when the extension updates, has no element zapper/picker, no per site switches, and no dynamic filtering.

      If you can live without these features, then good for you. But there’s no need to get frustrated about our claims just because we need better ad-blocking and privacy functions than you.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For situations where you’re forced to use chromium browsers it’s better than nothing, but abandoning chromium browsers is the right thing to do. An example of a situation where you can’t is an IT policy preventing you from using Firefox.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Google is not killing uBlock Origin. It’s changing how Chrome works. uBlock Origin will continue to work in my Firefox and other browsers.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is a shit take. Manifest v3 is like activex. As of right now, it shuts down extensions they don’t want. Going forward, it sets up a system for extensions that are publisher-approved. When internet explorer took over the market I could still use Netscape until I couldn’t. I’m hoping Firefox doesn’t reach the same end

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They’re changing how chrome works… …in a way that just coincidentally makes ad blockers a lot less functional.

      They’re an advertising company, no conflict of interest there at all

  • astanix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Turning off auto updates on chrome was convoluted. I assume everything will break when they force this update even with auto updates off.

        • Nikls94@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Interesting. I only got my Mac about a year ago and since then I’ve used AdGuard mainly because it’s the only good thing on iOS and I assumed uBlock Origin never was a thing for Safari.

          • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It basically wasn’t. The original developer allowed a fork on platforms they weren’t interested in, drama ensued and eventually, the Apple thing happened anyway.

            uBlock became uBlock Origin once the "origin"al developer took over the project again.

  • echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I switched to Firefox about a month ago for personal use. It’s nearly impossible for me to quit using Chrome, though, due to work.

    I don’t hate Firefox, but it does absolutely do some stupid shit that I don’t like.

      • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        For me, it’s mostly that the Android app doesn’t have a tab bar, even on tablet (just a stretched out phone ui), and i want a browser i can sync across all my devices, so that issue with the tablet ui is enough for me to use a different browser (the amazing Vivaldi) everywhere.

      • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        MS Teams does not work properly on Firefox for example (I’m forced to use it once in a while for work). Same with other web-apps that often don’t function correctly.

        On Android Chrome manages to stay open while multitasking while Firefox will close the tab 90% of the time requiring reloading the page. That’s especially annoying during check-out or logins when I need to switch to a 2FA app.

      • echo@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago
        • It’s not super simple to setup multiple, completely separate profiles like it is in Chrome
        • I never, ever visit google.com while I do visit gmail.com at least daily. Yet, when I type ‘g’ the suggestion is always google.com
        • I visit m.fark.com on my phone quite frequently. Firefox on my phone randomly decides I want to do a google search for ‘m.fark.com’ instead of visit the site
        • I don’t want the recently closed tabs to be tracked and listed, yet there is no way to turn that off
        • If the menu bar is displayed the the first browser tab is left aligned. If the menu bar is turned off then the first browser tab is indented for no obvious reason.
        • I don’t think I can clear my history without it closing all of my Firefox instances and making me reopen everything.

        There’s no one thing that is a show-stopper… just little annoyances.

        It’s not firefox’s fault, but I still use music.youtube.com and google hangouts and there’s no option to treat them like standalone apps like there is with chrome.

        • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I don’t think I can clear my history without it closing all of my Firefox instances and making me reopen everything.

          That’s not true - are you using always private mode?

          • echo@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            No, I’m using the ‘Forget about some browsing history’ button. You can selectively remove some entries just from history, but that still leaves them in your recent tabs list. If you just want the last 5 minutes of browsing gone then you have to do the rewind and that closes all tabs/instances.

            • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Why not just open private browsing windows if you don’t want your browser remembering those pages? Are you deciding afterwards that you want to forget those pages?

              • echo@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Are you deciding afterwards that you want to forget those pages?

                Frequently, yes… There’s also some pages/content on sites where you have to be logged in. Yeah, you could go private and login, but that’s just more steps. I just want to hit a button and have it nuke the last 5 minutes of my browsing without closing my current tabs/browsers.

                • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Not trying to be obtuse here, but why are you pruning your history in the first place? Is someone auditing your browsing history? I’m personally not interested in removing my browser history for the most part - and certainly not frequently enough to notice this limitation.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 minutes ago

        As someone who uses Vivaldi, which has a significant number of power user and customization features, the fact this is no longer a thing is fucking bonkers to me

        https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/compact-mode-workaround-firefox#:~:text=Firefox Last updated: 6/6,https://mzl.la/3JM0ViX

        I can turn on an unsupported flag to make the UI a little cleaner for me

        To me, it’s wild that the browser for the user decided to deprecate an option like that. Since they dropped XUL support I have very few options on customizing my browser outside of a theme or just writing my own CSS

        From there, I’d just point to:

        https://vivaldi.com/features/

        Firefox pulls in like 500 million dollars a year from Google. Barely any of those features exist in Firefox

        I started with Firefox. I used it from day one, when it was an experiment coming out of the Mozilla suite.

        I want to use it day to day so bad

        But it’s become “how do we chase chrome”

        And occasionally they get wins like this. And it no longer feels like

        “How can we be best?”

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can customize the Firefox UI with CSS, if you’re looking for really advanced customization capabilities.
          I’ve made a one-line theme as my ‘compact’ mode of choice, where URL bar and tabs are all on one row, but you can find lots of pre-made themes out there.
          See !firefoxcss@lemmy.world for more info and help.

          And well, you shouldn’t compare Firefox and Vivaldi from a monetary side.
          Mozilla develops their own browser engine, which is really important for the web, whereas Vivaldi only really develops that customizable UI. If Google stops publishing the source code of Chromium, Vivaldi is dead in a few months.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I know that ploum blog post gets cited way too often on Lemmy, but this is a situation where I think Google has either intentionally or inadvertently executed a variation of the “embrace, extend, extinguish” playbook that Microsoft created.

    They embraced open source, extended it until they’ve practically cornered the market on browser engine, and now they are using that position to extinguish our ability to control our browsing experience.

    I know they are facing a possibly “break up” with the latest ruling against them.

    It would be interesting to see if they force divestiture of chrome from the ad business. The incentives are perverse when you do both with such dominance and its a massive conflict of interest.

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    LMAO welcome to Firefox, the objectively better Browser. Might also use a custom search engine or DDG while at it.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why the LMAO?

      Firefox was and still is recently vulnerable to a massive zero day:

      https://www.darkreading.com/cyberattacks-data-breaches/critical-mozilla-firefox-zero-day-code-execution

      Mozilla is now using users for their new AI focus.

      We need to support continuous competition in the browser market through enhanced support and integration of W3C standards. And at the most important, decoupling corporations from the browsers. At the moment, it seems Google is being actively defensive (see manifest v3) against that while Firefox (Mozilla corporate) is just sort of moot on the issue, more concerned with AI.

      As soon as you think it’s “us vs them” and your browser is also owned by a for profit company, we’ve lost

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There are Firefox forks like LibreWolf if you need to be a crybaby about Mozilla being a company that needs to pay their developers with the most user friendly way possible…

        Also their AI is more of a play thing for some of their developers, they need to go with the flow at least a bit. Its also opt in where i am, idk if thats the case everywhere, but if not its opt out.

        Furthermore, from your own article:

        Mozilla has patched a critical security vulnerability in its Firefox Web browser that’s being actively exploited in the wild

        Oh noooo they patched it.

        Keep being a crybaby and use Opera, for all i care you can even install yourself red star OS.

      • muelltonne@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Still better than Chrome. Mozilla is not perfect, but in comparison to Google and its behavior they are saints.

          • BonerMan@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            To reduce reliance on Google… With the goal to change how advertising works, less annoying, less asshole ads would benefit everyone.

              • BonerMan@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Its not doing that, you can use a fork if you want, or, and that would be the important part, put a condom over your internet cable before it enters the router, safety first.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Mozilla is mostly funded by google. With the current cookie laws from the eu to try and stop user tracking, they developed a new solution together.

          Both chrome and firefox analyze your behaviour on your pc/phone/device. Then instead of giving websites the right ads, your browser tells every website you visit (with such ads) about you. You can google “privacy sandbox” if you’d like to know more.

          So you better not be gay in a place like iraq, and be in need of using your school’s website on a personal computer.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Not just that, not everyone who was listed in their open letters apparently agreed to or knew they were in them

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It’s not like we have great options here. Safari isn’t supported on Windows or Linux. Opera has its own issues (like predatory loan apps) even if you’re willing to pay for it. Crossing my fingers that Ladybird will work out, but it has a long way to go (though it did better than I thought it would when I tried it a few months back). Everything else is some variant of Chrome.

          If you need to be on the web at all, Firefox still seems like the best of the shit pile.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Highly recommend setting up a PiHole. It may not be quite as comprehensive as uBlock, but it cuts the ads way down, and it’s not something that browsers can easily bypass. You do have to make sure to shut of DNS over HTTPS, or setup a separate solution for that to tunnel into PiHole.

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Make no mistake, what Google is doing is absolutely dangerous. Malvertisements are definitely a thing. Back in 2010, I got a virus from an ad on a meme site that just went through and trashed my hard drive.

    It’s unfortunate that there are use cases out there where Chrome is absolutely required. Firefox can’t display large directories, for instance. It’ll lock up while chromium browsers work fine.