American law outlines a series of protections for those accused of crimes but not yet convicted. (Like the 4th-6th amendments)

Does your country have any unique/novel protections of the rights of potentially innocent people accused but yet to be convicted?

If not are there any protections you think should be in place?

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think this happens before the conviction, but I always find it extremely alienating how US press reports will show mugshots and full names.

    I mean, damn, why not hand out guns, so vigilantes have it even easier?

    Certainly wouldn’t be worse for the convicted than having to spend the rest of their lives doing crime, since they won’t find a job anymore…

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      this is America, half this country gets a boner when they think about shooting someone and being praised for it. all cops started this way and so they don’t feel bad when the enable vigilante justice in others. they all think that shit’s cool as hell anyway

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It absolutely happens before the conviction. Arrest records and mugshots are generally public information, and the press will publish them immediately in many cases.

      There is also no obligation to retract/amend if the person is found innocent, and there is nothing the person can do if they use careful language (arrested for, accused of, allegedly). Most publications will refuse to take the article down later if the innocent person requests it, too, meaning that follows them forever. There are companies that make money offering the service to bury such articles to make it easier to get a job.

      The US routinely demonstrates why most its peers do not do it this way.