cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/17686207

It’s a very long post, but a lot of it is a detailed discussion of terminology in the appendix – no need to read that unless you’re into definitional struggles.

  • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    28 days ago

    Agreed that Bluesky’s run by a single corporation so it’s different than today’s ActivityPub Fediverse, but the Fediverse’s historical approach to “open federation” isn’t the only approach. Even in the ActivityPub world we’re seeing more and more experimentation with allow-list federation.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      allow lists run by individual instances…not a gatekeeping board of a single entity.

      my points stand. if you want to join a true federating twitter clone youre not using the atprotocol.

      • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        For people who want to join a twitter clone there aren’t any good ActivityPub options – Mastodon’s good at other things, but isn’t a good Twitter alternative let along clone. And ActivityPub’s version of “true federation” isn’t the only kind of federation. That said, I agree that AT isn’t an option for people who want to join a federating-in-theActivityPub-sense-of-the-word Twitter clone,