A federal rule banning fake online reviews is now in effect.

The Federal Trade Commission issued the rulein August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against those who knowingly violate it.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said about the rule in August. She added that the rule will “protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Better than nothing but it also seems like it might be kind of difficult to prove the company allowed it knowingly.

    • FPSkra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      It prevented reviews and testimonials that misrepresent that they are by someone who does not exist. Fairly easy to prove. If they catch an individual posting a review while posing as anyone but themselves, It’s a done deal.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Well if you take a company like Amazon they know everything about you already, including if you actually purchased the item you are reviewing. And that should be a simple first “hurdle” for a reviewer to be legit. They already have a way of sorting them out and labeling them in place. So I would assume this means if you don’t have that label your review doesn’t go live. They can then add more qualifiers to prove they know the reviewers are real, since this seems to put the onus of proof on the company not that FTC.

      Edit - some words

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        It is possible I bought the item at my local warmart though and then review it on amazon. I don’t know if anyone does that, but it is possible.

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I feel like although possible now, that this may need to change going forward since I’m not sure how Amazon can validate your review if not done through their platform.

          This of course fragments reviews to specific retail storefronts, but if the platform can’t validate at least the fact you purchased the item I don’t see anyway they can even begin to know you’re leaving a legit review.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I find that Amazon allows me to do that for good reviews, but whenever I leave a bad review for something I bought somewhere else the review disappears.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      In this context “knowingly” means “intentionally”, not that they knew there was a law against it.

      An entity is in violation if they knowingly commit the act, not that they knowingly broke the law.

      • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yes, I understand (ignorance of a law is no defense at least in the US) that but it still may prove difficult to actually prove.