• webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You did.

      I tend to disagree with this, not that it’s entirely incorrect, but I think quality can’t be disregarded; can the product be made safely is another factor

      Meritocracy was shown to be related to the ability to generate capital because capital is economic power and allows you to concentrate more power. Quality didn’t factor in because consumers buy bad products. Safety didn’t factor in because consumers buy unsafe products. The best childcare workers aren’t paid more than an average software developer because it’s not meritocratic for workers.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        can the product be made safely is another factor

        This is not a direct line to worker saftey or some sort of moral concern.

        The exact following line is:

        These aren’t smoke screens that some capitalist business man made up to trick you into thinking they are altruistic. These are things that might that effect bottom line.

        My next argument would be you would merit very little when it comes to business acumen.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          You keep going in circles. Whose safety? The fact that it is related to the bottom line DIRECTLY contradicts yourself, that safety is only a concern as related to the money, because the money is the only concern, and that money flows to the owner.

          You can call my acumen bad, but I’m just using historically very successful businesses and their complete and utter neglect for worker, consumer, and environmental safety.