Why do cell phones have a data limit but home internet doesn’t? I understand bandwidth limits, but how can home internet get away with giving users all the data they can use, but cell phone providers can’t?

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    If my phone didn’t have a cap, I’d hotspot it all, which is basically the idea of cellular home internet routers. I found a home router without a cap, which time will tell to be true, but it’s still more expensive than my phone with a very large but not unlimited cap.

    They want to get paid, that’s the reasoning. The amount of data is really irrelevant except for pricing.

    Roaming fees used to be the same until EU stepped in. Hopefully EU will eventually step in and order a full stop to ALL CAPS too. We live in the “future” now, right? Bring me my free unlimited connection so I can download that car they talked about.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Not all of them do, I’ve seen that in America data limits on home internet is common, and here in Europe unlimited phone data is common.

  • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Mine Internet at 500gb, but it’s only an extra $10 for unlimited data. My cell data is unlimited but I know they throttle speed after a certain amount. At least I don’t get charged extra.

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I guess it depends what country you’re in. I don’t have limits on either and don’t want to imagine having that concern.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      The first time I saw a mobile plan without any limits was somewhere around 2003-2004. Pretty soon after that, all the competitors started offering similar plans. So glad we got rid of those stupid limits.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Home internet did happen to have a limit in most places prior to the pandemic (at least in California). It was one of the big quiet changes that occurred. For example, ATT used to have 150GB limit about 5 years ago but it kept getting bumped up.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      That is exactly the reason.

      Those caps also prevent the small percentage of people who would abuse the system from having as much of a negative impact on other users.

      Back when the company I used to work for offered an unlimited voice calling deal (we’re talking 25 years ago on the old analog cell system) there were a few people who decided it would be a good idea to use their phone as a baby monitor, which tied up a voice channel for days at a time. There being only a dozen or less voice channels on most towers at the time made that kind of thing a signifigant cause of congestion.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yep. And to add to your statement, its probably to make torrenters/massive downloaders pay or curtail their activities. Then streaming came along, voice chat, etc… that both helped us entertain ourselves and work within the home from the pandemic. If people didn’t have unlimited plans, they would switch ASAP because it was no longer a want, it became a need.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 days ago

    AT&T asks the same question. They provide the bold option to pay more than the competition and get data limits on your home internet.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Limits on home service used to be more common, but some plans still have caps. My home internet has a cap, it is just really, really high and they charge you more for exceeding it instead of cutting off access.

    My phone also has a cap, but the cap means the connection is throttled instead of charging more.

    I have had a home plan in the past woth no limit, but they didn’t offer service to my new house when I moved.

  • Thteven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 days ago

    I went over my home data cap a couple times. The ISP rep was not amused when I called to have them bump my speed down to the lowest tier and add unlimited data. I pay less now and the speed difference is not noticeable for me with daily usage. I told them I was going to download random crap all day, delete, and redownload out of spite lol.

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Home Internet usually doesn’t have unlimited internet. There’s usually caps baked in somewhere. Don’t believe me? Read the fine print. At some point, at some bandwidth usage in the monthly cycle, they will throttle the living crap out of your connection. It’s written into pretty much every contract I’ve ever signed, and I’ve been with over a dozen carriers of landline internet over the years.

    The reason being that they don’t want you serving websites or business class functionality with residential level internet. They didn’t build their network with those constraints. They want you paying for and using the business internet package, which has dedicated bandwidth and no caps because you’re paying for a dedicated line to be run.

    For mobile phones? Old pricing models still trying to be relevant. There’s no technical reason.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Home internet has unlimited internet

      It’s not 2002

      Well, maybe not in that…one… country

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Are you sure?

        There’s “hard” caps, and there’s “soft” caps. When you hit the soft caps with many of these ISP’s, they start throttling your internet usage by a substantial amount.

        Relevant Screenshot of caps as of Sept 2024.

        • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          13 days ago

          I said “home internet hasn’t had data caps for a couple of decades, well except maybe in that one country where people have no consumer rights and everyone gets fucked up the arse for money just for existing”. I’m paraphrasing here.

          You said - “Oh yeah, let me prove you right!”

          I’m not sure where you’re going with this

          • Tyfud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Ok, I missed the sarcasm and allusion to the US as the country you were talking about. That’s fair.

            I assumed the OP was asking the question for the US. Which of course, is the thing people in my country do. Assume everything is about us ;)

              • Tyfud@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Closer to 96/95% now ;) But yeah, your point stands. What’s even worse about this, is I’m working on a dual citizenship with Portugal, so I should have had more self-awareness than I showed ;)

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          I can only speak from a UK perspective, but most home ADSL/VDSL/Fibre providers don’t have limits, other than “if your usage is tanking the network, we’ll ask you to knock it off” type clauses.

          Most providers are also signed up to an agreement that if your speed drops 50% below the agreed speed on the package on average, they’ll either give you refunds, or let you out of the contract.

          The only ones that throttle are the bargain basement operators aimed at people who don’t care, and one otherwise very competent provider that for some unexplainable reason only gives 1TB by default, charging an extra £10 for 10TB.

          And I guess there is also a pricing step up to guaranteed bandwidth. For business use, they tend to be things like 1gbits headline, 500mbit guaranteed burst, 100mbit guaranteed sustained.

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          I am in the US and I do not have a hard cap, and I regularly go WELL above the soft cap listed for my ISP in that image with no throttling.

  • WxFisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 days ago

    In theory at least it’s because you pay for a specific bandwidth for home internet (the size of the pipe) but a specific amount of data for cellular (how much stuff you can get through a fixed sized pipe).

    Home internet is a little unique in that way, almost all other utilities are consumption based with no real tiers in terms of how it’s delivered (you pay for the volume of water or gas you use, electricity is the same, just different units).

    Networking equipment gets more expensive based on the bandwidth it supports, but it doesn’t much care how many bits you push through it. So ISPs charge based on their capacity to deliver those bits, and provide tiers at different price points. Cellular though is much more bandwidth constrained due to the technologies (and it used to be much more so before LTE and 5G), so it didn’t makes sense to charge you for slow or slower tiers. Instead the limiting factor is the capacity of a tower so by limiting data to small amounts it naturally discourages use. That model carried forward even now that the technologies support broadband speeds in some cases. As such and ISP could provide the biggest pipe (highest speed) to all homes and just charge based on consumption (they used to in the days of dial up, and satellite before starlink always has). Many ISPs instead are now double dipping though and charging for both.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago
    1. Some home internet providers have data caps.
    2. Some wireless providers do not have data caps.

    What you’re up against:

    Home internet providers have high-speed lines that run through population centers and into every neighborhood. The backbones are fiber, so adding more capacity isn’t all that expensive. If they run a 2.5-gigabit line to your neighborhood and it gets stressed, they can upgrade the local aggregate. Wired internet has enough bandwidth to service an incredible number of people.

    Wireless internet needs towers and faces challenges like exposure, interference, and balancing power so everyone doesn’t try to reach the wrong tower. Each tower has to have it’s own network backhaul to service everyone in that area. Each tower has limited bandwidth and time to slice up the connections. It’s hard and expensive to expand cellular tech.

    Data caps let IPS’s handle capacity planning. Charging more for overages makes money and dissuades users from making them upgrade prematurely.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Umm, my home internet has a 50GB per month limit. Can’t complain much though, it’s cheap at literally $1 a day, and I’m not a gamer or online streamer.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      That’s more than $1.50 per Gigabyte.
      When you download a game from Steam, most games you literally pay more for the data than for the game.
      Even when you pirate, you pay like $15 for a BluRay quality movie

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        You’d be dumbfounded to see what I’ve been able to accomplish using my connection. Terabytes of games archived, I just didn’t have to download nor upload them myself.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 days ago

        I do browse through YT videos, but I don’t bother watching full length movies. Honestly, I’ve lost interest in watching newer movies, seems like a waste of time to me. However, I do enjoy educational and scientific content.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Good thing, because some games would take up all of that just to download and install.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Found the American. In France that would be a huge ripoff compared to what the other providers have to offer. Like, literally any VDSL offer is around 30€/month (or under) and no caps

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      For ~$30 a month, that’s a complete and utter rip-off.

      Even here in Neuland Germany you get at least decent internet with no caps for that price.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Guess so. The installation tech had to test like 18 sets of dead phone lines before managing to find one live pair to even connect the internet.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      13 days ago

      How is 1€/day cheap for such limited home Internet? I guess it might depend on where you are, but unless you are in the middle of nowhere that seems expensive.

      Here in Germany for example, which really isn’t known for its cheap internet, I can find options that offer 100Mbit Flatrates for 20€/month.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I ain’t even talking about the internet speed, I’m talking about the data cap. And $1 a day is about as cheap as it gets in my area.

        • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          as cheap as it gets in my area

          That’s not a very good approach to assess prices

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        $50/mo for internet is a relatively low rate for the US unless you’re lucky enough to live in one of the few places with municipal internet.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        My German friends and family don’t believe me when I tell them how expensive internet and phone is in the US. They all think it’s expensive in Germany. Having said that, there are some big differences in take home pay.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Home internet had data limits too. In fact, you originally paid by the minute of usage through your telephone line before flat rates became a thing, blocking all calls in the process. Back in the day we’d use various time limited free trials by AOL and other ISPs to browse (Freenet was a very big one here in Germany), which they kinda threw out battling each other for customers. Look up AOL free trial CDs for example.