• Buttflapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Copilot by Microsoft is completely and utterly shit but they’re already putting it into new PCs. Why?

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Investors are saying they’ll back out if no AI in products. So tech leaders will talk talk and all deal with ai.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m waiting for the part that it gets used for things that are not lazy, manipulative and dishonest. Until then, I’m sitting it out like Linus.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is where I’m at. The push right now has nft pump and dump energy.

      The moment someone says ai to me right now I auto disengage. When the dust settles, I’ll look at it seriously.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI has been used for these things for decades, they are just in the background and not noticed by laypeople

      Though the biggest issue is that when people say “AI” today, they mean specifically LLMs, but the world of AI is so much larger than that

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m waiting for the part that it gets used for things that are not lazy

      Replacing menial or boring tasks is like 90% of what I’m hoping from it.

  • Tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, he’s right. AI is mostly used by corps to enshittificate their products for just extra profit

  • Doug7070@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mr. Torvalds is truly a generous man, giving the current AI market an analysis of 10% usefulness is probably a decimal or two more than will end up panning out once the hype bubble pops.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like with any new technology. Remember the blockchain hype a few years back? Give it a few years and we will have a handful of areas where it makes sense and the rest of the hype will die off.

    Everyone sane probably realizes this. No one knows for sure exactly where it will succeed so a lot of money and time is being spent on a 10% chance for a huge payout in case they guessed right.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has some application in technical writing, data transformation and querying/summarization but it is definitely being oversold.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cryptocurrencies can be useful as currencies. Not very useful as investment though.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Git is a sort of proto-blockchain – well, it’s a ledger anyway. It is fairly useful. (Fucking opaque compared to subversion or other centralized systems that didn’t have the ledger, but I digress…)

  • houstoneulers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    100% hyped by the people who’ve watched a few youtube videos and now claim they’re an expert

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s my usual feeling with Linus takes.

      Well, I agree, but he could be nicer about it.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    In a way he’s right, but it depends! If you take even a common example like Chat GPT or the native object detection used in iPhone cameras, you’d see that there’s a lot of cool stuff already enabled by our current way of building these tools. The limitation right now, I think, is reacting to new information or scenarios which a model isn’t trained on, which is where all the current systems break. Humans do well in new scenarios based on their cognitive flexibility, and at least I am unaware of a good framework for instilling cognitive flexibility in machines.

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    game devs gonna have to use different language to describe what used to be simply called “enemy AI” where exactly zero machine learning is involved

    • Rogers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      The latest llms get a perfect score on the south Korean SAT and can pass the bar. More than pure marketing if you ask me. That does not mean 90% of business that claim ai are nothing more than marketing or the business that are pretty much just a front end for GPT APIs. llms like claud even check their work for hallucinations. Even if we limited all ai to llms they would still be groundbreaking.

      • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Korean SAT are highly standardized in multiple choice form and there is an immense library of past exams that both test takers and examiners use. I would be more impressed if the LLMs could show also step by step problem work out…

        • Rogers@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Claud 3.5 and o1 might be able to do that; if not, they are close to being able to do that. Still better than 99.99% of earthly humans

          • Tamo240@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            You seem to be in the camp of believing the hype. See this write up of an apple paper detailing how adding simple statements that should not impact the answer to the question severely disrupts many of the top model’s abilities.

            In Bloom’s taxonomy of the 6 stages of higher level thinking I would say they enter the second stage of ‘understanding’ only in a small number of contexts, but we give them so much credit because as a society our supposed intelligence tests for people have always been more like memory tests.

            • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Exactly… People are conflating the ability to parrot an answer based on machine-levels of recall (which is frankly impressive) vs the machine actually understanding something and being able to articulate how the machine itself arrived at a conclusion (which, in programming circles, would be similar to a form of “introspection”). LLM is not there yet

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    89
    ·
    2 months ago

    So basically just like linux. Except linux has no marketing…So 10% reality, and 90% uhhhhhhhhhh…