Copilot by Microsoft is completely and utterly shit but they’re already putting it into new PCs. Why?
Copilot + Pcs tho…
Investors are saying they’ll back out if no AI in products. So tech leaders will talk talk and all deal with ai.
it is basically like how self improvement folks are using quantum
I’m waiting for the part that it gets used for things that are not lazy, manipulative and dishonest. Until then, I’m sitting it out like Linus.
This is where I’m at. The push right now has nft pump and dump energy.
The moment someone says ai to me right now I auto disengage. When the dust settles, I’ll look at it seriously.
AI has been used for these things for decades, they are just in the background and not noticed by laypeople
Though the biggest issue is that when people say “AI” today, they mean specifically LLMs, but the world of AI is so much larger than that
I’m waiting for the part that it gets used for things that are not lazy
Replacing menial or boring tasks is like 90% of what I’m hoping from it.
Decided to say something popular after his snafu, I see.
Ai bad gets them every time.
Linus is known for his generosity.
Linus is a generous man.
Dude…
What?
True. 10% is very generous.
Yeah, he’s right. AI is mostly used by corps to enshittificate their products for just extra profit
He is correct. It is mostly people cashing out on stuff that isn’t there.
Mr. Torvalds is truly a generous man, giving the current AI market an analysis of 10% usefulness is probably a decimal or two more than will end up panning out once the hype bubble pops.
Like with any new technology. Remember the blockchain hype a few years back? Give it a few years and we will have a handful of areas where it makes sense and the rest of the hype will die off.
Everyone sane probably realizes this. No one knows for sure exactly where it will succeed so a lot of money and time is being spent on a 10% chance for a huge payout in case they guessed right.
It has some application in technical writing, data transformation and querying/summarization but it is definitely being oversold.
There’s an area where blockchain makes sense!?!
Cryptocurrencies can be useful as currencies. Not very useful as investment though.
Git is a sort of proto-blockchain – well, it’s a ledger anyway. It is fairly useful. (Fucking opaque compared to subversion or other centralized systems that didn’t have the ledger, but I digress…)
Yep, Ik ai should die someday.
100% hyped by the people who’ve watched a few youtube videos and now claim they’re an expert
I agree with Mr. Torvalds
That’s my usual feeling with Linus takes.
Well, I agree, but he could be nicer about it.
In a way he’s right, but it depends! If you take even a common example like Chat GPT or the native object detection used in iPhone cameras, you’d see that there’s a lot of cool stuff already enabled by our current way of building these tools. The limitation right now, I think, is reacting to new information or scenarios which a model isn’t trained on, which is where all the current systems break. Humans do well in new scenarios based on their cognitive flexibility, and at least I am unaware of a good framework for instilling cognitive flexibility in machines.
game devs gonna have to use different language to describe what used to be simply called “enemy AI” where exactly zero machine learning is involved
Logic and Path-finding?
CPU
No AI is a very real thing… just not LLMs, those are pure marketing
The latest llms get a perfect score on the south Korean SAT and can pass the bar. More than pure marketing if you ask me. That does not mean 90% of business that claim ai are nothing more than marketing or the business that are pretty much just a front end for GPT APIs. llms like claud even check their work for hallucinations. Even if we limited all ai to llms they would still be groundbreaking.
Korean SAT are highly standardized in multiple choice form and there is an immense library of past exams that both test takers and examiners use. I would be more impressed if the LLMs could show also step by step problem work out…
Claud 3.5 and o1 might be able to do that; if not, they are close to being able to do that. Still better than 99.99% of earthly humans
You seem to be in the camp of believing the hype. See this write up of an apple paper detailing how adding simple statements that should not impact the answer to the question severely disrupts many of the top model’s abilities.
In Bloom’s taxonomy of the 6 stages of higher level thinking I would say they enter the second stage of ‘understanding’ only in a small number of contexts, but we give them so much credit because as a society our supposed intelligence tests for people have always been more like memory tests.
Exactly… People are conflating the ability to parrot an answer based on machine-levels of recall (which is frankly impressive) vs the machine actually understanding something and being able to articulate how the machine itself arrived at a conclusion (which, in programming circles, would be similar to a form of “introspection”). LLM is not there yet
So basically just like linux. Except linux has no marketing…So 10% reality, and 90% uhhhhhhhhhh…
That says more about your ignorance than anything about AI or Linux.
90% angry nerds fighting each other over what answer is “right”
What
Some Linux bad Windows good troll
Did I fall into a 1999 Slashdot comment section somehow?
Never heard of Android I guess?
You’re aware Linux basically runs the Internet, right?
You’re aware Linux basically runs the
InternetWorld, right?Billions of devices run Linux. It is an amazing feat!
So basically just like linux. Except linux has no marketing
Except for the most popular OS on the Internet, of course.
