• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is such a dumb stat. Y’all just want to blame consumption on someone other than yourself.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The stat clearly shows billionaires are doing far more consumption. Seems more like you want to blame consumption on someone other than the worst offenders.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        🤷‍♂️ I’m not going to try and pump up numbers that are consumption of consumers. It’s dumb 🤷‍♂️

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is such a weird comment to make. Why is the stat dumb? There are many words to use to describe a stat, dumb doesn’t mean anything. You don’t even explain why.

      How does that help me blame consumption on others? You’re confusing “i want billionaires to stop polluting too” with “I can pollute because look at this dumb stat”. And we all know where you got the latter and why you think people are like that. Projections as usual.

      Why be a billionaire apologist? Whatever you want billionaires don’t help you achieve it, and are arguably worse for you in every way. It’s really weird to defend them, especially on this topic