Wasn’t even close. 60/40.

  • Nurgus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    12 days ago

    We had a referendum on ranked choice voting (referred to as AV at the time) here in the UK some years ago. The campaign against it was shocking. Well funded and extremely vocal. Bizarre lies and misinformation.

    Someome really hates changing FPTP.

      • Nurgus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        The funny thing is we just had a really unusual election where the right splintered and FPTP handed a landslide to the centre-left party.

        The right is probably going to flip and campaign against FPTP soon.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      Reducing extremism, reduces the impact of advertising, which means business loses influence… and the rich lose influence. So that is who hates ranked choice voting.

    • ECB@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t know anything about the campaign in Oregon, but most people are scared of things they aren’t familiar with.

      Also I’m guessing neither party really supported this much, since they benefit from first-past-the-post.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Wonder what the campaign against it was. This seems like a easy win. It’s not even a religious thing like pro-choice.

        • evidences@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          Probably just a bunch of bullshit falsehoods, look at the campaign against issue 1 in Ohio. It was a change to the state constitution to put a citizen run commission in place to draw maps for voting districts and Republicans ran a campaign that was just straight up lying about what the issue was about. Then even threw misleading ballot language on the ballot, I doubt anyone read the ballot language though because it was a small novel.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            Issue 1 took up the entire back page of my ballot yesterday and was just nonsensical legalese. People voted on it based on how there prefered candidates told them to, and we all saw who their preferred candidates were last night.

        • ECB@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Politics (especially among republicans) has become a bit religious, so it’s not really THAT different I guess