• spauldo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You mean the attack the USA deliberately provoked by moving its naval assets to encircle and blockade Japan with the express goal of provoking an attack to create the necessary pretext to go to war? That Pearl Harbor?

    Funny how almost all our battleships were in Hawaii, then. Not much of a blockade. Perhaps you mean that we stopped trading with them and they declared it an “act of war?”

    In any event, the US didn’t need an excuse to join the war. Germany was giving us plenty already.

    How many other nations do you know of that were defeated in war that were prevented from having a standing military for nearly a century and instead was occupyied by the victor’s military forces and the Supreme Court of that country ruling in favor of the military interests of the dominator?

    Germany wasn’t allowed a standing military, either. They managed to convince the allies that they could contribute to NATO, and were allowed to do so again.

    Japan is forbidden to have a military by their own constitution. Certain parties have tried to have it amended to allow a more active military (the SDF is almost purely self-defense), but so far the political will hasn’t been there for it.

    The “ruling in the interests of the dominator” bit is your words. I wonder if the Supreme Court of Japan would agree with your description of their decision. I somehow doubt it.

    links I’m not going to read

    Yeah, the trade balance with Japan was heavily skewed on Japan’s side. The US and Japan worked out a rebalance of the system. What, exactly, is so evil about that?

    We don’t need to only critique the USA for atrocities. It’s important to see the world for how it works. Japan’s occupation of Okinawa is still terrible and this action to put a US military base is a good example as to why. If Okinawa was fully assimilated into Japan, it wouldn’t be the dumping ground for USA military bases enforced by the Japanese Supreme Court. Likewise despite people thinking Hawaii is an assimilated part of the USA, it wouldn’t be the tragedy that it is.

    Tell me you’ve never been to Okinawa without telling me you’ve never been to Okinawa. It’s not some hick island full of yokels. It’s a modern, fully-integrated Japanese prefecture. A bit more laid back than the mainland, but that’s to be expected.

    The bases there were built before the US decided to return Okinawa to Japan. The US has been slowly decommissioning bases and returning them to Japanese control ever since.

    Did you even check what the supreme court was ruling? They’re not building a new base. They’re relocating MCAS Futenma, because it’s smack dab in the middle of a city and can’t do night operations without waking everyone up and filling the air with jet fuel fumes.

    What is it with you tankies and Hawaii, anyway? Have you spent any real time there? I have. Saying it’s not fully part of the United States is bizarre. It’s a state. The only way it could become more a part of the United States is if you somehow towed the islands to California.

    The largest minority group in Japan are the Ryukyuan people of Okinawa and Japan won’t even recognize them. Japan is a junior imperialist partner of the Western imperial block executing to advance the interests of the USA and, by proxy, the North Atlantic bourgeoisie.

    They’re Japanese citizens, with all the rights and responsibilities of every other Japanese citizen. You want to talk about disenfranchisement, talk about the Ainu. I’m sure you’ll figure out some way to blame that on the US too.

    “North Atlantic bourgeoisie” - that just cracks me up.

    The idea that this should be above reproach because it’s not the worst thing the USA did is ridiculous. The idea that Japan deserved it is just bog standard liberal bloodthirst.

    I never claimed anything was above reproach. I said it wasn’t a good example of imperialism and that you should choose another example if you want to criticize the US.

    Now tell me some unrelated nonsense (maybe bring up Hawaii again?) and that you’re “not going to post anymore” because it’s useless to talk to me (which it is - you’re very clearly in the wrong on this one), so we can get this behind us.

    • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re Japanese citizens, with all the rights and responsibilities of every other Japanese citizen. You want to talk about disenfranchisement, talk about the Ainu. I’m sure you’ll figure out some way to blame that on the US too.

      As if most Japanese people in general aren’t politically disenfranchised with their one party political system and of course that one party has been a puppet of amerikkka since the end of the war, also includes a bunch of the very same fascists you keep using as justification for US imperialism

      If the Japanese fascists are the reason US imperialism is justified in Japan than why did amerikkka let all of those fascists go with out punishment? Why hire them to continue the same work they were doing?

      • spauldo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A tankie saying a one party system is bad? The irony is strong with this one.

        • robinn2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Uphold the Communist Party of China and Marxism-Leninism-MZT; Amerikkka inspired Nazism and will, like its child, die in a bunker with a gun to its head

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          When the one party is the puppet of the US, as they said in that very sentence, yes it is bad. If there were two parties that were both controlled by the US (and really there are two parties in coalition, aren’t there?) it would be just as bad

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      In any event, the US didn’t need an excuse to join the war. Germany was giving us plenty already.

      Pure historical revisionism. Isolationism was a strong force in the US and it’s not like popular sentiment was opposed to fascism. The attack was extremely convenient for “forcing” the US to participate without the isolationists being able to complain about getting “needlessly entangled in foreign affairs”.

      Not that I think the US did wrong by fighting Japan. I don’t know very much about the state of the US military at the time but really my biggest qualm in terms of the start of the war is that they didn’t start fighting the Nazis sooner.

    • robinn2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      In any event, the US didn’t need an excuse to join the war. Germany was giving us plenty already.

      When the US declared war on Japan in response to the attack on Pearl Harbor, it did not declare war on Germany; Germany declared war on the US three days after the US declared war on Japan. The U.S. was the ideological predecessor to Nazism [1] [2], and only joined the war when they were threatened.