• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, well that’s good anyway. Is it true that they only have like one major server? Because I’ve heard that, but I haven’t looked much into them, so I’m not sure if it’s still the case or not. To my understanding, they are meant to be a federated network, but really only have the one server.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of course it is, why would people throw millions at investing in a product and then decentralize it to the point that there weren’t any bottlenecks to apply pressure and extract a profit back out of it? It makes no sense and would be a ridiculous business strategy.

      What is a good business strategy is associating your product with visions of decentralization while never truly intending to get there in practice.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fair point. They will just grow their user base and then go all walled garden just like all the rest of the platforms. Protocols not platforms.

    • Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah this is still true as far as I know. Honestly this is probably what allowed BS to gain a foothold; I like mastodon too but asking new users to pick a server was always going to be a source of adoption friction.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      AFAIK that’s still the case, yes. I don’t have a Bluesky (or Threads) account so I can’t confirm.