• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have no love for big corps, but they’re likely just reading the writing on the wall. they have to deal with retribution for the next 4-12 years and they have no interest becoming the rebels. I’m kinda impressed they stepped away at all other than it probably was money spent for nothing.

      • fern@lemmy.autism.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        IBM supported the Nazis, and if they’re the only tech giant not fighting musk they’re going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do “writing on the wall” anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t care where the money comes from, and at this point they know there’s no cost to their reputation for doing shit like this either.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    So pretty much everyone, who’s already got a reputation for being shit, or has fallen from grace completely, has returned. No surprises there

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    And nobody was surprised. I predict most advertisers will return by the end of January for the same reasons they left previously: It’s the right business decision at the right time. Remember that the next time a corporation makes a pledge. It’s always about money.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I was going to say that’s incredibly on brand for Disney. Everything I have ever heard about Comcast seems to back up this move.

      I’m surprised about IBM though, more because I didn’t realize they were still around than anything else.

      • Zacpod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        IBM sold “inmate” counting machines to Nazi Germany. Like, sent techs there to the camps to size up the requirements and everything. It should NOT come as a surprise that they’re back on X - they’ve never had an issue with Fascism (or any other ism) as long as they had money to spend on overpriced iron.

        • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would they even need a machine to count the prisoners? If they didn’t feed their victims and were planning to murder them anyways I’m having trouble understanding why they wouldn’t be okay with just a loose head count. Was it really just for counting?

          I hope I’m not coming across as insensitive, I’ve just never heard about this and it sounds so ominous.

          • Zacpod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

            Black reports that every Nazi concentration camp maintained its own Hollerith-Abteilung (Hollerith Department), assigned with keeping tabs on inmates through use of IBM’s punchcard technology.[2]: 351  In his book, Black charges that “without IBM’s machinery, continuing upkeep and service, as well as the supply of punch cards, whether located on-site or off-site, Hitler’s camps could have never managed the numbers they did.”[2]: 352

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter. They’re not doing it to get people to see their ads, they’re doing it to bribe Elon since he has actual political power now. Kind of like how oil companies buy ads on news media, even though you don’t need to be persuaded to buy oil - it’s to buy favorable coverage.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My electrical utility (PG&E) advertises all the time. Like what am I gonna do, not buy electricity? It’s so obviously just a bribe to the media companies.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            lol they already won that political chess. You still have to pay a connection fee and a transmission fee and a lawsuit settlement fee and an environmental remediation fee, even if you use 0 kW/h. Also with the NEM 3 plan if you have any excess solar generation you give it to them at about 1/10th the price that they will sell to you during the same time of day.

            Edit: I exaggerated unfairly, it’s like 1/8th the price. Also for the people who adopted solar early and were promised a 25 year contract (called NEM 2) they can now magically alter the deal and change the way that credits are calculated despite the 25-year guarantee that was made.

            Edit 2: did you know our governor is a large shareholder of stock in our utility company? The same one that has the power to appoint people to the board that is supposed to regulate the “private” utility? America is doing great.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I wonder if that’s why Google advertisers. They are probably the most recognized company on the planet so they definitely don’t need the eyeballs.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      When Hitler needed to track the unwanted in his concentration camps, IBM was there.

      Today, Trump has selected IBM due to our experience in this field of Fascism.

      FYI: while this is not true, I’m sure most Americans will believe it.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah, a history joke! Don’t forget Coke(Fanta)! Also, the history of Volkswagon is pretty interesting.

      The surprising part is, despite everything Henry Ford believed, I don’t remember ever hearing Ford being on that list.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Still, “under $2,000” for a corporation of that size is a surprisingly low amount, compared to the others. Not even worth the negative publicity. Odd choice.

  • Tehhund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did anyone read the article? Besides the top 2, these amounts are paltry:

    Data by MediaRadar showed that Comcast, which spent less than $1.5 million on X this year, was followed by Warner Bros. Discovery at $1.1 million, whose ads are supporting theatrical releases of movies, and Disney at under $550,000. Lionsgate spent less than $230,000, while IBM allocated under $2,000.

    That’s embarrassing.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    of course they are, they might as well lick his asshole while they are at it. big corporations will always without exception do whatever is necessary to survive.