Summary

Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign has reignited fears among undocumented migrants with promises of “mass deportations” and migrant communities are bracing for uncertainty and a new wave of nativism.

His administration plans to target those deemed public safety or national security threats, potentially reinstating workplace raids and using military resources.

Advocates warn that “collateral arrests” could sweep up migrants without criminal records.

Many, like “Dreamers” protected under DACA, fear family separations, while others, such as Carlos in NYC, hope Trump’s economic policies might benefit them.

“A lot of Latinos, those who can vote, did so because they think he [Trump] can improve the economy. That would be very good for us too,” said Carlos, an undocumented Mexican who lives in New York City.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    What part of “mass deportations” do people not understand? Trump told us what he’s going to do. His cabinet pick told us what he’s going to do. They’re going to do it.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ummmmm Conservatives already see them as criminals because they are here “illegal”. By default all undocumented migrants are criminals.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Trump also said he’d aggressively deport and sort through the mistakes later. He’s going to deport legal immigrants too, and I very much doubt they’ll let them back in without an extensive legal battle. Which will never move forward because he’ll intentionally starve the court system (like congress already did at his order) so that realistically, they will never get through the system.

      Great fucking job giving Nazis free reign, you stupid, stupid, evil fuckers. You had a choice to fight nazis when it was easy. Just a vote. But you chose nazis, one way or another.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ohhhhh I agree with you for the most part. But the last part?! Who exactly are you referring to as you? If you are chastising Democratic leadership 100% Anyone else other than literally Nazie’s (aka Trump, JD, the majority of RNC members and leaders, and some of their voters), shouldn’t be blamed.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Obviously, this statement was not targeting you specifically. “You” is targeted towards Trump voters and non-voters.

          We knew what was on the ballot. I don’t care that the DNC could have done better. When the choice is “meh” vs literal Nazis, you’re a damn nazi if you didn’t vote directly against them.

          I’m fucking done mincing words after voters gave them the House, Senate, POTUS, and all the god damn courts.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            First off, before I continue. I voted blue.

            But it’s naive to not see voting as transactional. Even more so when major issues face America and humanity, has tested and proven solutions.

            For example, Healthcare. The solution to America’s Healthcare crisis is Universal health care. With the middle ground between Universal and fully private is the public option. Neither party would even entertain the notion of a public opinion. The Democratic party could have secured millions of votes if they added public option or universal to their platform. They knew this. All the polling said those were overwhelming popular positions to have. It’s poor leadership and poor advising that kept Harris from having that.

            Several polls and Arab, Palestinian, and liberal organizations told the party, that not having a concrete plan to save Palestinian lives would cost Harris millions of votes. It’s poor leadership and advising to not have Palestinian sovereignty and return to post ww2 boarders as part of the campaign. It’s not like Christian evangelicals and zionest were going to vote blue anyways? So why not appeal to your base and a large voting demographic?

            I can go on with several other progressive topics. (education, military spending, justice reform, foreign policy, wealth redistribution, climate, money on politics, ect.) So many progressive solutions to very real problems were never addressed or openly opposed by Democrats. The only downside to taking up those causes would have been money from top donors.

            Voting is inherently transactional and will always be that way. For “my” vote your platform must have zxy and you must try to get as close to xyz as possible. If you don’t have xyz why should I vote for you? You don’t care about my issues and values, why should I care about yours. It’s the world we live in. Either the democrats take up a full progressive agenda or they’ll continue to lose in the most critical time in human history.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              48 minutes ago

              If you don’t have xyz why should I vote for you?

              because in an effectively two party system where neither party has xyz you should definitely vote for the party that also aren’t nazi’s ?

              The degree of closeness to your ideal of progressive policies doesn’t mean shit when the choice is nazi’s vs not nazi’s.

              Unless you are arguing that those weren’t the choices available here ?

              • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                Yes everyone understands all that. But are you saying we people that vote blue should keep trying the same failing tactics?

                If our strategies (manly from leadership and keyboard warriors) keeps failing against literal Nazies, shouldn’t we change tactics?!

                What other options do we have!? Keep openly ignoring solutions that the majority of Americans want? Or go crying about the none voters that feel the is no party representing them?

                You don’t like it but look around!

                Seriously, what why do you think the none nazi party can get more votes? Times running out and we are losing! Either come up with another answer or keep saying things that obviously lost us an election to Nazies.

                Support Universal health care or get the Nazies again. What side are you on?

                Support a 2 state solution in Palestine or get the Nazies again. What side are you on?

                Support redistribution of wealth or get the Nazies again. What side are you on?

                Support the removal of money in politics or get the Nazies again. What side are you on?

                Support justice system reform or get the Nazies again. What side are you on?

                If you expect a different result with what we’ve been doing than we truly are doomed. What’s the definition of insanity again?

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 minutes ago

                  Yes everyone understands all that. But are you saying we people that vote blue should keep trying the same failing tactics?

                  No, but if your tactic changes haven’t been implemented by the time voting comes around and the choice remains “nazi’s vs not nazi’s” then you should be voting “not nazi’s”.

                  “The Dems continue to fuck up repeatedly, so i can understand why people chose nazi this time” isn’t a tenable argument.

                  I’m not disagreeing with your disappointment in, well, everything.

                  I’m disagreeing with this part of your previous reply

                  Anyone else other than literally Nazie’s (aka Trump, JD, the majority of RNC members and leaders, and some of their voters), shouldn’t be blamed.

                  If a person understands that the choice is nazi vs not nazi and then actively chooses to not vote, they are tacitly choosing nazi.

                  “If i vote for the not-nazi’s, they won’t understand how disappointed in them i am” is not a good argument.

                  “Their policies don’t align with what i want” is not a good argument

                  “They don’t represent my values” is not a good argument

                  There is no good beginning half to the sentence “< INSERT REASON HERE >, so i tacitly enabled the nazi’s”

                  Except maybe, “I genuinely believe the alternative is worse, so i tacitly enabled the nazi’s”.

                  Even then i’d probably disagree, but it would be a substantive argument.

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s only 11 million undocumented immigrants in the united states. The Trump Administration has pledged to deport 20 million. Which means they are going to be expelling American citizens from their home as well. It’s not just going to be criminals. It’s going to be anyone whose skin tone they don’t like.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Which if they are born in the United States are United States citizens. Which is important to remember. They’re looking to deport people to countries they’ve never been to. Whose languages they don’t speak. It would be one thing if they were talking about young children who still needed their parents. Yes by all means don’t tear families apart is the Trump Administration previously did. But they are talking about the adult children as well. So it’s particularly extra despicable.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I don’t know why they even expect countries to cooperate with that shit. Why should Venezuela accept US citizens being deported into the country?

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Because authoritarian regimes whether they are capitalist or leninist Etc don’t ask. The people just show up there if they’re lucky or in a mass grave if they’re not. They’re not asking Venezuela or any other country for permission to send people there. Honestly a lot of the time they just dump them in Mexico and let them be their problem. After all xenophobia isn’t a responsible or rational response.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Mexico still needs to cooperate on some level to allow border agents to cross the border and dump ex-citizens.

              Or I guess the US could just keep them in camps.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      people with accents, too. doesn’t matter if you’ve been here for ten years: if you sound different, someone will report you to ICE

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    you all understand this is about racism, right? this is a giant dog whistle for rounding up non-white people and getting them the fuck out of their white nationalist dream.

    its not about crime, or which immigrants are good or bad. its about kicking out the brown peoples. its easy to manipulate racist voters. they are all ignorant cowards.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      All those Muslim folks who voted for Trump to “punish” Harris are in for a rude awakening. This isn’t only about Hispanics.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I doubt there are a lot of illegal Muslims. Most “illegal” immigrants are from border countries.

        Deporting our DACA immigrants would be really bad for the economy, talk about brain drain and also illegal immigrant workers who contribute more to the economy than they extract.

        The leopards will be eating their own faces. I would need to look up numbers but fairly certain more republicans use illegal immigrant labor than democrats.

        Also, the spite and told you so banter is kind of offensive. “My candidate lost so now you have to suffer the consequences,” it’s very childish and not very thoughtful or helpful.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Legal or illegal matters very little. During Operations Wetback 1 and 2, American citizens were rounded up as well as the illegal immigrants/foreign workers and deported to Mexico for “looking too Mexican,” and I’ve heard of at least one or two border towns that have done the same thing in the past 10 years (and crashed their economies doing it). I don’t expect Wetback 3 to go any differently other than probably targeting more minority communities besides Latinos.

          And what do you expect people to do other than make exasperated “I told you this would happen” comments? It’s not like making comments on Lemmy will do anything when the dictator hasn’t even entered office yet and the only thing we can generally do anyways is whine to those in office to actually do something. There’s donating to various groups put in place to help minority communities, but that also has nothing to do with commenting on Lemmy.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            50 minutes ago

            We can acknowledge that Harris and the DNC really botched this election and discuss ways to makes changes going forward instead of pointing fingers at voters we want to vote on our side.

            But I do hear you. It’s funny how serious we take ourselves here, armchair politicians who have all the solutions. It’s important to remember that it’s ok for us to be wrong about some things and laugh at ourselves. And to take a deep breath, and work towards solutions instead of berating people and pointing fingers. Point to Harris and the DNC. They lost this election and did everything in their power to do so.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      i think there’s so much discourse about this since Latin men voted, on the whole, for trump. there is a non zero number of people who, if trump implements his border control plan, voted for their own deportation

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        8 hours ago

        also, white people dont own a monopoly on racism. some of the most racist people i know are also ‘legal’ immigrants of a minority population.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          8 hours ago

          no one hates immigrants more than an immigrant who made it

          i’ve heard that quote a few times. but i think it’s on the whole sadder:

          no one hates the poor more than a poor person who thinks they made it

          • Erasmus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 hours ago

            This is so true. I heard sooo many times from Latinos where I work after the first Trump election that they voted pro-Trump. The ones who are here who have managed to get citizenship look down on the ones who don’t have it. It’s like a flip of light switch.

      • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Here in México we have a say that goes like:

        The worst enemy of a mexican is another mexican

        You connect the dots

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Please stop spreading misinformation.

        A supermajority of Latino voters voted for Kamala, including a majority of Latino men specifically.

        https://unidosus.org/press-releases/hispanic-voters-back-harris-over-trump-by-a-62-37-margin-cite-economic-concerns-as-top-priorities/

        The only groups that supported Trump with a majority are white people.

        White people are the problem, not Hispanic and black voters.

        https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-06/how-5-key-demographic-groups-helped-trump-win-the-2024-election

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          didn’t mean to spread any misinformation. i still see in what you’ve sent me that latin men lag behind latin women by a significant margin voting about evenly between trump and harris

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes majority was higher among women significantly.

            More Latinos voted for Trump than in past elections.

            I just keep seeing democrats trying to blame Latinos and blacks for their bad campaign.

            Hope you’re having a good weekend 👍

            • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              thanks. you too. i see the failures as being mostly relating to misunderestimating the power of the right wing propaganda machine, even as the world over has gotten more authoritarian

              • DancingBear@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                The crazy thing about accusing Latinos of being sexist or racist is that Mexico currently has a female progressive president who is closer to Bernie than any other US politicians.

                Trump was speaking to the economy, the thing that was highest priority for these voters. He may be lying his ass off, but he was talking about it. Meanwhile, Harris was talking about how happy she was to be supported by her 80 corporate CEO’s and going on and on about it being so exciting to have Dick and Liz Cheney’s support.

                When Walz came into her campaign her lead skyrocketed, but then Kamala pivoted to the right, while Trump continued to talk about the economy. Bad move on her part.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They will grab anyone they can get their hands on. Criminals will have the advantage that they know how to hide, and there are way more non-criminals, so Jose Average will be picked first, being the easiest target to fulfill the quota.

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 minutes ago

      Also while some peoples definition of criminal is “murderer” or similar some peoples definition is closer to "you did or a relative did something not 100% legal in the last generation or two.

      edit: some peoples definition of criminal will definitely include unhoused or non-land owning eventually

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They made “migrating” a crime, so, yeah, leopards…face…

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m worried they’re going to start raiding schools and daycares as well in order to force parents to turn themselves in or just to be malicious. A lot of children are going to be separated from their parents.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That would be right in line with their normal behavior. Seeing how many children they kidnapped in the previous Trump administration.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Aren’t criminals already being deported if they are caught? He was clear that he is after immigrants (in some speeches illegal, but in some even legal)

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The trump admin couldn’t be bothered to keep the children and parents together while caging immigrants last time–why would anyone expect him to differentiate the legals from the illegals?