• Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I am not fan of RFK or any of this incoming administration, but I have to admit…those are going to be the most productive camps in the entire world! 🤣

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think this is how they plan on making up for immigrant labor.

    But lol if you want systemic food shortages this is a great way to go. Farm labor isn’t easy, it can’t be carried out by someone who is addicted enough to the point that they need this farm to get better. Farm labor needs to be reliant and self-directed, and drug addicts are not reliable and can barely direct their lives.

    People on depression or adhd meds are not necessarily drug addicts. I can’t believe we have such incompetent people in charge now.

    • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The plan to make up for immigrant labor is prison labor. Tank the economy, further criminalize homelessness. Wouldn’t be shocked if debters prisons make a big comeback.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Seems the country is being run by lunatics, not sure how America is going to survive this. There’s no such thing as a planned and controlled economic collapse, wonder what happens if another country pounces on America while it’s trying to recover. All of this seems like a bad idea for national security too. What a mess.

  • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So they’re just already saying the “camps” part out loud, eh? I guess when you have Hitler’s playbook, you can move faster than Hitler did.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Wow, I’m so glad this dipshit who’s never had to work a day in his life could give this paternal wisdom to the plebs who might need this medication to retain employment and not die destitute in the streets.

    Who knew they just needed to be sent to a farm upstate so they could run free forever and ever?

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Is he not aware that the fascist pumpkin he will be working for pops those like breath mints?? Please do send that rapist con man to a labor camp.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    When it comes to the brainworm guy - if he really plans on banning vaccines - is he trying to kill off all the old people? Is he trying to kill off all the children?

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Technically people do owe taxes on revenue from illegal activity. You certainly could put a tax on something that’s illegal, I just don’t think it would bring in much revenue I’d you’re still prosecuting people for that same thing you are taxing.

        • _bcron_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, the legality of the source of the gain or income is irrelevant in regard to taxation.

          There’s actually no line in the 1040 specifically for income arising from illegal activity, no box to check or anything, so it’s hard for the IRS to even filter returns with that criteria.

          Most criminals with significant income from illegal activity still have to worry about the random audit or being the focus of interdepartmental attention so many do pay taxes and have a decent backstory to explain how they pay their mortgage, but money laundering is a more common way to go about as opposed to listing a whole bunch of vague shit as other income (which would raise quite a few questions if their file was pulled).

          Fun movie trivia: in The Irishman, De Niro’s character, a hitman, claimed to ‘paint houses’ for a living due to his ability to furnish receipts for things like rollers, rags, cleaning supplies, and drop cloths. Probably bought a lot of paint too and handed it off to be tossed it in some dumpster

            • _bcron_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Here’s line 8z on the schedule 1, as you can see and like I said, it’s not specifically for income generated for illegal activity. It’s for all other income, and since there’s no box specifically for that kind of income, you’d list it under other income.

              If there was a line specifically for illegal activity you’d put it there, but there isn’t, so you put it in the catch-all ‘other income’.

              Furthermore, 8z is like form 8949 (sale/disposition of other assets) in that the description is blank for the filer to fill out, so one doesn’t need to explicitly state that it’s from illegal activity. If you’re a fence and bought a bunch of stolen power tools and sold them at a profit you’d probably just want to put ‘sale of refurbished power tools’ rather than ‘sale of unlawfully-acquired power tools’

  • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just sounds like torture camps people voluntarily go to. Why would they remain voluntary? These people think public facilities that give out small doses to prevent people from dying from withdrawal and needle dispenseries to prevent STIs are immoral, so we all know it’s torture. This is obvious whether you read the article or not for all of the nuance trolls.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My therapist encourages me to reparent myself, by which they mean that when I remember something fucked up from my childhood I should try and imagine what would have happened in a loving and supportive environment. Also, they also encourage me to give myself experiences I missed out on as a child. Yes, I sleep with a plushie and it’s awesome.

      I have no idea what RFK, Jr means. Sounds like brainwashing.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is part of some rural grift facilities which probably started with “trouble teens”. In recent years I’ve seen reports of these “farms” for “distressed” women. It’s usually a place with Ranch in the name. Example: https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/11/18/the-christian-maternity-ranch-in-texas-is-a-disaster-in-the-making/

    Permaculture farms, for example, are already well known for relying on abusive work conditions. See Joel Salatin:

    https://medium.com/permaculture-3-0/fall-of-a-hero-f9ac80a08c0c

    https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/11/joel-salatin-chris-newman-farming-rotational-grazing-agriculture/

    • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Are these the same people that abduct teens at night and bring them to these camps where they die of dehydration?

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Those are more like wilderness survival training, except nobody in charge has any wilderness survival training of their own.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          He mentioned SSRIs in the article. Now I’m imagining a bunch of PTSD infantry combat vets laughing their ass off at the instructor.

  • Draghetta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wonder if commenters here went beyond the headline, or bothered to read the quote in the comments.

    The actual quote is not remotely as sinister. He said that he will start these community farms (which is not a labour camp for f sake) where addicts (which is not everyone who takes meds, it’s those who do but shouldn’t, of which there are thousands) can voluntarily choose to go, which is a far cry from “I’ll shove anybody who takes antidepressants into a labour camp” as the title suggests.

    There are a lot of people who take meds from dealers instead of doctors, who may have started recreationally but are now addicted to them. This is what he is lumping together with other kinds of drug addicts. It’s not even that stupid, it has been shown in studies that addiction is more effectively addressed by giving the person meaningful things to do.

    Now you can have your opinion on this idea and you can be skeptical of his implementation and you really should, the guy is a nut job who shouldn’t be allowed within ten kilometres from a government office - but sending regular joes to concentration camps because they take meds is not what he said.

    This title is rage bait, don’t fall for it.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yep, this sounds like the harm reduction approach that the left has been advocating for. It sounds like these are alternatives to prison for people with addictions. Not saying he’ll be able to make it work, but “tax cannabis + harm reduction” is much better than what a lot of Republicans’ drug policies are.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The problem is:

        • RFK wants to ban legal medications and his multiple other statements make it clear he thinks organic food can replace them. That’s creating clear harms for people.
        • He may envision this as a voluntary commune but in reality once he has government backing these could be something non consensual. It’s worrisome coming from an openly authoritarian administration.