BadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down123
arrow-up1396arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comBadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square194fedilink
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down6·1 day agoWhy is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
minus-squareFreefall@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoBecause she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.
minus-squarebtaf45@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agoHarris was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Why the fuck would you NOT vote for that?
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·edit-21 day agoThat doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·19 hours agoShe was forced as the only choice on voters and liberals find that acceptable
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·14 hours agoIt doesn’t matter. She was the choice we had.
Why is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
Because she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.
Harris was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Why the fuck would you NOT vote for that?
That doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
She was forced as the only choice on voters and liberals find that acceptable
It doesn’t matter. She was the choice we had.
Fucking child. Grow up.