Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Ukraine would lose the war if the U.S., its primary military supporter, cuts funding.

Speaking to Fox News, he stressed the importance of unity between the U.S. and Ukraine as Russia accelerates its territorial gains.

Zelensky acknowledged Ukraine’s challenges on the battlefield, despite new U.S. weapon supplies, including long-range missiles and anti-personnel land mines.

He criticized German Chancellor Olaf Scholz for engaging with Putin, calling it a risky move.

Trump has pledged to end the war quickly but offered no specifics.

  • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unfortunately the Budapest Memorandum doesn’t obligate the US to actually protect Ukraine.

    Hopefully Europe can fill the gap left if Putin’s puppet cuts support US support

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Europe unfortunately has neither the infrastructure nor the reserves to provide armaments in volume to Ukraine. It has only very recently started switching its military from being a small projection force for asymmetric warfare to a much larger self defence army. Completing the change will take some time though.

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I hope Europe is prioritizing appropriately. Seems they’ve been caught flat-footed in multiple ways and they’re only slowly responding

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Of course the letter of the treaty can be interpreted, what does “immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine” include in literal obligations? But the intent of the document seems clear that the signatories are there to hold each other accountable to prevent nuclear proliferation, if the guarantees are no longer valid like the repeated Russian violation of Ukraine sovereign borders, the other signatories are expected to either protect Ukraine or reinstate their nuclear arms.

      Edit: including link to the document text https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        “seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine”

        That’s the strongest language I see, and that obligation could be filled by just pushing for Ukraine’s defense in the Security Council.

        I think the US has been unfairly reserved in its support of Ukraine. They should have given jets, permission to strike in Russia, and more a long time ago. But I don’t think they’re obligated by that memorandum to do even what they have.

        • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It is significant that all of the signing countries including Russia and except Ukraine were all members of the UN SC at the time and 3/5 of the permanent members states. It’s not like they’re getting on the phone to call someone else, they’ll be the same people answering the call to act to provide assistance.