• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No. Of course not!

    Failing to Reject the Reagan Revolution, and mass embrace of the Jack Welsh style “trickle down” economics lie, by BOTH parties was the point of no return, almost half a century ago at this point. This car was already totaled.

    Citizens United years later was just a victory lap by the owners pissing on the long dead corpse of the dream of societal equity.

    Trump is just another symptom of that intransigent reality we all live in.

    I’d say hope for collapse, as painful as it is, to have any hope for a better life for our children, maybe, but oligarch greed made climate change and at this point inevitable ecological collapse in the coming decades means there really isn’t hope for a better society/civilization for generations(if they eventually develop technologies to better cope with the new hellish climate reality) if at all.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would US collapse though?

      I am not following.

      The current regime showing zero signs of distress, in fact they could extract even more and it seems plebs will accept it.

      Half the country is doing OT on bootlicking and regime whore worshipping.

      Most people on here too, and fedi is pretty redical by mainstream lol

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In the near term, people increasingly not being able to afford basic necessities like housing and food will lead to increased societal violence, but that likely won’t cause collapse.

        Climate scientists are increasingly warning of ecological collapse, meaning core climate systems will fail, like the Atlantic Gulfstream which will cause global famine and destruction, and that might be the end of human civilization all together, we won’t know until we do it within the next half century, and see the full extent of our fine work, a climate hostile to agriculture, dependable fresh water, possibly even standing structures not made of steel and concrete.

        But man are we speeding towards that cliff for short-term private shareholder profit, wheeeee!

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah but even the bleakest estimates would take generations. Owners are getting paid today.

          Also, us is the holy land, food and energy sufficient. So us itself can survive the climate change unlike most other countries.

          Sure some plebs will die but that’s a small price to pay for success.

          Time will tell

    • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I always did find it amusing that they are called the United States when it seems like it’s constantly teetering on brink of another civil war.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        teetering on brink of another civil war

        Shit has to get much, much, much worse before people are willing to take up arms against their own family member 'en mass. A civil war isn’t one in which you fight a far away enemy, a civil war is one in which many of your family members and friends are on the opposite side. We are nowhere near a civil war, not even close.

  • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    From an outsider’s perspective, I think a lot of people think you guys sailed past the point of no return back in the 80s.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Remember when the entire world was convinced there was absolutely no way Bush, an idiot, fascist, religious bigot, etc could get re-elected?

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Nobody thought that at all. Most presidents sitting during outbreaks of war retain their positions. You’d have to have been in a complete echo chamber to believe this stance. The moment 9/11 happened, it solidified Bush’s Second term in stone.

        I assume you mean Jr. Because Sr wasn’t the moron that Jr was.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah no, I’m gonna disagree. Being outside of the US at the time, most people did think that. And yes, obviously I’m talking about Jr since Sr didn’t get re-elected. 9/11 was a full three years before the election of his second term. And most importantly before he started the war in Iraq. A war that was widely viewed as illegitimate outside the US.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 month ago

            It was viewed as illegitimate inside the US too. And yeah, I remember, even as a 17yr old at the time, seeing the event happen live and lamenting to my mother that we were going to have another Bush term over it. Historically for America that’s always been the case.

            • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It was viewed as illegitimate inside the US too.

              You’re recollection of events is clearly skewed. Something like 80% of the population approved of it at first. Meanwhile there were protests in the millions of people around the world against it.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq

              A Gallup poll made on behalf of CNN and USA Today concluded that 79% of Americans thought the Iraq War was justified, with or without conclusive evidence of illegal weapons.

              • Asafum@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It’s so fucking disgusting to be honest… I’m just a worthless dumb shit uneducated factory worker and at 17 I could see right through that garbage… We’re a hateful group of people whether we care to admit it or not, there was a lot of anti-islamic/Muslim/Arab sentiment in the US at thst time. People were bloodthirsty.

                I was going to join the military after highschool to get training since I’m poor and had no real direction to gamble on college, and then take it from there whether to stay in or not. Once talk started of invading Iraq I immediately said fuccccck that. I still blame Bush partially for my current situation. :/

              • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You should read your own link, because it also mentions that by the end of his term, most disapproved. By 2006 it was viewed as illegitimate by most. My recollection of events is fine, thanks.

                America will generally approve of measures when they are led to believe it affects their security and safety. It’s the years afterwards that determine if it continues to hold support.

                • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  You should read your own link, because it also mentions that by the end of his term, most disapproved

                  I clearly stated “at first”. Mind you by the end of his term a majority still thought it was the right thing to do.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It was, but there were people bitching about it. It may be an unconventional way to show it but if you look at Eminem’s album released in 2004 the second track was Mosh.

                “Stomp, push, shove, mush, Fuck Bush, until they bring our troops home”

                “Let the president answer a higher anarchy Strap him with an Ak-47, let him go, fight his own war Let him impress daddy that way No more blood for oil, we got our own battles to fight on our own soil No more psychological warfare, to trick us to thinking that we ain’t loyal If we don’t serve our own country, we’re patronizing a hero Look in his eyes its all lies The stars and stripes, they’ve been swiped, washed out and wiped And replaced with his own face, Mosh now or die If I get sniped tonight you know why, Cause I told you to fight.”

                To me that’s pretty obvious mainstream music pushing us to turn back against exactly what this false patriotism that exists today in MAGA is.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reagan, he is the starting point of everything: the tax cut from 73% to 28%. USA never got back on track after this.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nope. Johnson.

        No, not that one.

        Andrew Johnson.

        So many ways it could have been better.

        He could have punished the Southern Aristocracy for starting the civil war. He could have ensured that the evil that led us there was exterminated forever.

        Failing that, they could have actually removed him via impeachment instead of falling just short. That would have at least established forever that the presidency is not some sacred “unimpeachable” office.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      What?!

      The 80s were fucked, but if you’re saying it was worse than the response to the Civil Rights movement…

      McCarthyism…

      Jim Crow…

      Or the KKK destroying reconstruction…

      Like, I could see saying that last one was the point, only if you start the clock immediately after resolving the civil war. Cause obviously a Civil War is what really happens after a point of no return. We lasted a couple years in between the two points.

      For as fucked as the last 40 years has been, as far as America goes we’re beating the average on basic human decency.

      What’s happening now isn’t new, it’s a slip backwards, which is unfortunately common when you try to fight fascism with moderate politics. It works for a little bit because they’re coasting off the last people who really fought. But all moderate politcs really are, is giving fascist time to regroup in the shadows like fucking Sauron.

      It’s a cycle, and we live in a time when you can learn pretty much anything about history in a few minutes on Wikipedia

      America can not afford for voters to stay ignorant. We need people who know what happened last time, what worked then, and what might work again. Stop acting like we live in unprecedented times, and start reading up on how fascism has been defeated historically.

      Cuz we’re up, like it or not shits getting real again. And the more people know what we’re doing then better.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was as surprised and disappointed as anyone, and I think we WILL take a few more steps backwards over the next few years, but I don’t expect an unstoppable fall into fascism.

    Most of the votes for Trump weren’t actually FOR Trump. They were against the current situation they are in. They see him as the revolution. The anti-politician that will bring real change. They think all his court battles are the “Man” trying to hold him down and keep him from disrupting a system that gave up on its people long ago.

    Of course that’s all bullshit, but, assuming that all “normal” people can see through his lies and that only evil, woman hating racists would support him, is a big part of why he was elected.

    Trump denied Project 2025 because he knew most people wouldn’t want it. (Honestly, I would be surprised if he even knew what was in it) If he lets the Christian nationalists push that whole agenda on day one, he’ll become the oppressive government that is taking away their freedoms. And nothing is more important to Trump than making Trump look good.

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I choose to believe that we are not. The true fight for our democracy by the working/middle class hasn’t even started yet. Some think it won’t. I choose to believe that good will again triumph and life is roller coaster of good and bad.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    It might be. Only time, and the actions of Americans themselves, will tell.

    It’s the biggest crisis in my lifetime. But we have survived other crisises, some-fucking-how, so maybe we’ll luck our way out of this one too.

    God has a special providence for fools, drunks, and the United States of America.

    • Otto Von Bismarck
    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, we’re a strangely resilient nation. Things that topple other nations have been crises to us. This may be the end and this may be a disaster so great we dismantle the right wing media dominance or any number of things.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe. US history is full of crazy fucked up shit that the nation has made its way through thus far. This kind of situation hasn’t really happened in the US before though, and historically these kinds of situations do not work out well. We are past the point of no return in that the status quo Washington Consensus or whatever you want to call the previous era is gone now, whatever is coming is something new and different and the US role and position in the world are never going back to what they were before. Really I would say this process started with Bush II but there is no reversing it now that Trump has won a convincing electoral victory. Whether we’re past the point of no return for the US constitutional order isn’t really clear yet but it’s not looking good.

    • Snapz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Appreciate your measured response. I’m wondering how long it will take folks to stop coping out of self preservation and say out loud that this isn’t anything we’ve seen before - it’s brand new and can go as far as has been threatened.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think the real answer is that we end up kind of like the UK – going from the worlds ultra-dominant superpower to a sort of slow regression to the mean, as China, India and others take the spotlight.

    When you look at what China is doing with their Belt and Road Initiative, and their move to dominate the transportation infrastructure of developing nations – the US isn’t anywhere near equipped to counter that. We’re still in a cold war mentality thinking that we will dominate as the world’s police force.

    Meanwhile, all the actual economies will be run by Chinese companies operating with state support.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Did Britain or Rome know the moments when Pax Britannia or Pax Romana had hit their tipping point to decline? I doubt it.

    I think the tipping point will only be observable through the lens of history many years from now with a subject heading of: This event was the beginning of the end of Pax Americana.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        USA was still very much on the rise at the advent of the internet. If you define the advent of the internet to be Arpanet, then that was 1969, the same year the USA landed on the moon. If you define the advent of the internet to be the first use of the World Wide Web that would be 1989 the same year the Berlin wall came down and 3 years before the Soviet Union collapsed, which was arguably the most powerful the USA has ever been as it was before China’s rise.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      We’re here in “no stupid questions”. The OP asked a question. So if you want to offer some of your knowledge and insight - go for it. But simply telling OP “you don’t understand” isn’t really adding anything of value.