• Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Yup. I am the international buyer at my Made in America company. We pay the tariffs. We do not absorb them it gets added into the price. And when China is 50-75% lower than American made, another 30% tariff isn’t going to bring the business back here. I kept posting that on my Facebook for weeks before the election. No one listens.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      30 days ago

      Even worse, China has already begun moving their Chinese-owned production to Malaysia, circumventing the tariffs on Chinese imported finished goods.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        30 days ago

        I heard about this a few months back on a podcast about auto parts. China just shipped the fan belts they were making to a warehouse in Vietnam, rebranded them, and shipped them to the US, tariff free.

        They did some sort of chemical analysis on the Made in China and Made in Vietnam belts and the formulation of the rubbers was identical.

        Enforcement to counter this would likely eat up too much of the tariff money, so it just won’t be done. China will still get paid the same, and at minimum we’ll eat China’s additional shipping costs.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Everyone seems to be wringing hands about policy, but this is just another datapoint that propaganda won this election.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      One possible silver lining:

      By removing dirt-cheap goods from the market, this could make it more difficult to ignore the underlying problem: People are not being paid enough for their labor to afford the things they need at home. Instead, they are expected to depend on subsidized/sketchy foreign manufacturing, while corporations and the super-rich are being allowed to extract a disproportionate share of the world’s wealth from everyone else, hoard it, buy favorable legislation and policies, and avoid paying their fair share in taxes. This is already unsustainable; tariffs will make it more obvious.

      (I don’t imagine this is why Trump wants tariffs, but perhaps he’ll accidentally place the straw that breaks the camel’s back, leading lawmakers to face either reform or revolution. Unfortunately, I think it’s likely to make things worse for the rest of us before it makes things better.)

  • Hellsfire29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Obviously. The point is, that if you make the product in the United States, you won’t pay the tariffs.

    Who would have thought that importing a product from China is when the 30% tariffs would apply?

    Biden never rolled back Trump’s 2017 Tariffs. Why didn’t he?

    Oooooooooo

    • Revonult@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      The problem is that it makes everything more expensive. With the alternatives costing 30% more all the domestic just raise their prices by 30% to match. Of course that gives some wiggle room for domestic to be like maybe 1% lower but basically everything shoots up because capitalism and extracting as much value as possible.

      Like when the steel and aluminum tarrifs went into effect the domestic prices jumped up with it.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I think once China slapped on retaliatory tariffs om farmers and the US had to drop a new wave of subsidies it locks in the tariffs a bit until a new wave of negotiations can be made. I suspect China stalled those negotiations in hopes they could dupe trump into a better deal.

      Given Trump is saying that the trade deal with Mexico is bad (the deal he negotiated) and is threatening tariffs on Mexico its clear he is just using tariffs as a scare tool. Unfortunately every world leader saw him get dog walked in the debates and knows he’s a moron so now its unlikely he’ll be taken seriously.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Major costs for most people are housing, transport and groceries - mostly domestic products already. We’d be far better off reducing those prices first.

          Realistically the US would need to import raw materials for things like electronics so for a lot of things it would just raise prices and domestic infrastructure/manufacturing would remain unchanged.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    30 days ago

    Yes, anyone reasonable knew that this would lead to higher costs. Americans are expensive to employ. The point of the tariff package is to bring back manufacturing and production to the USA. Stop importing so much crap from China and other places, and things will balance out. That increase in costs should be compensated for by jobs for American citizens across all sectors if people respect the purpose of the tariffs - to disincentivize imports whenever and however possible.

    • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      This is one of those things that Trump never actually said, his supporters have just been saying for him for months now. Another one of those “what he really meant was…” Because that’s what won’t happen, even if it did it would take decades to move production back.

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      I buy parts internationally for a domestic manufacturer. The parts are as good if not better than us made. They are also 50-75% less than US WITH the current 25% tariff. Another 20-30% increase isn’t going to bring it back to the US, it will just increase costs.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        All that says is that we need to increase import costs 80-85% and instate a labor tariff so that the company has to pay taxes equal to a US citizen for every offshore employee.

        • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Sure ok. Things cost 4x more. Are they going to pay us 4x more? Musk said we need to buckle down and quit spending. Spending money is the one thing keeping the economy out of a recession or depression. Can’t have it both ways.

    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Except, this measure won’t result in that at all. Punishing companies for importing is only going to punish consumers. The company wants it for as cheap as possible, and that will often be importing. Even ifbit becomes expensive to import, it will be cheaper than the capital needed to set up the infrastructure for manufacturing domestically. Rewarding companies for sourcing materials and labor domestically will incentivize them to bring jobs here. At least more so than making them pay more to bring it in.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      That’s never going to happen. What will happen is that companies will raise their prices slightly higher than the tariffs cost them, fire more of their workforce, and then brag to investors about their most profitable quarter ever. Plus, that would require the tariffs to be on finished products only. I’ve already heard of several companies announcing no Christmas bonuses this year because they need to stock up on materials in anticipation of the incoming tariffs.

      And most of the people supporting tariffs thought that they were going to make things cheaper AND that China was going to pay them.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The point of the tariff package is to bring back manufacturing and production to the USA.

      That was the claim.

      But in reality, American businesses will do whatever is more profitable for them.

      And even if it becomes more profitable to build a factory (including paying the tarrifs on the machinery needed 'cause that factory hasn’t been built in the US yet) and hire (and train) a workforce, that will take years to do, and even more years before the capitol cost is recovered and it starts being profitable.

      By which point Trump will be dead and gone and maybe a more sane government will have eliminated some of Trump’s more stupid impacts. And then the owner of the new factory may not be able to compete with overseas factories at a level of extreme profit they want…

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    It’s amazing we’re having this conversation given that the pinnacle of conservative thought is that you can’t make the rich pay for anything because they’ll just pass the costs down to you, and yet that seems to go out the window when you can be racist about it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      If they knew how tariffs worked, fewer of them might have voted for the dumbass proposing to make things cheaper by raising them.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      In their minds, they literally think of them as some sort of “cover charge” that foreign manufacturers pay to get their goods into the US, and that they will do so gladly and neither seek other places to sell nor raise their prices. They think that these companies will eat the losses until they decide to build factories in the US, or they will simply wither away and American factories will sprout up like dandelions in a sidewalk.

      The fact that all of it is completely wrong doesn’t matter, because the people telling them otherwise don’t have on a red hat and an ill-fitting suit.

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      They are also super easy to explain. It is a tax. That is increasing yet another tax - vat.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      The same way they thought “Mexico will pay for the wall” was gonna work - they didn’t think about it at all.

      They just blindly trusted the habitual liar, despite all evidence to the contrary.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    Once again, corporate america will use this as an excuse to raise prices more than necessary, gouging the people and stuffing the pockets of CEOs.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      The average American is already stretched to the breaking point with what overinflated goods they can afford. We’ll soon see people either buy just the bare essentials or start stealing at a much higher rate than we already have. Food riots might very well be a thing in the world’s richest country soon.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        The genius part is now that Republicans are in charge of the government here, deficits no longer matter, and they will push through huge tax cuts on the rich. These massive tax cuts will only trickle down to working folks in the form of direct rebate checks, just to give Trump an excuse to have his signature all over them. Trump will convince these people that the additional money is to help offset rising prices, and his voters will believe it.

        Deficits will no longer matter until after the midterms, and then if Democrats can gain back control of either house of Congress, the deficit will become a big problem again, that can only be solved by slashing more programs. The checks will stop, and Trump will blame Democrats.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yep, and the prices will stay high even after the tariffs are gone.

      Grocery stores are the worst about this too. Prices are still absurdly high despite there being no more supply issues from covid.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      They don’t give a shit that the customers will be paying more. In fact, if anything, they probably love the excuse to jack up prices further - or further cut their workforce to the bone, or whatever the latest fad in padding executive compensation packages is.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        30 days ago

        I’m sure they probably do - shit as Walmart is a depression in consumer spending is overall bad for them.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          30 days ago

          What are the customers going to do? Buy from someone else? Wal-Mart is already often the cheapest option around.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            It’s already often the only option around. So many small businesses like local supermarkets and hardware stores got closed down in small towns by Walmart moving in and now there’s no alternative. I see it all over in central Indiana and Illinois.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              30 days ago

              Buying less, but they’ll be spending the same amount of money, barring rises in other expenses not directly related to tariffs (rent, utilities, etc). Their quality of life will simply go down. Wal-Mart doesn’t care about that. We could all be medieval peasants for all they care.

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              29 days ago

              Less sales but more expensive, so same income, less costs.
              Also less regulations, so they can sell crappier and cheaper alternatives for the same price.
              Also, lower taxes on big corporations.
              And they’ll probably be able to use the private prison system to turn shoplifters into very cheap slave labour, saving on wages.

              Seems like a win-win situation for Walmart, though not so much for its customers.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    30 days ago

    Tariffs make companies able to compete better within the walled garden, but weakens their competitiveness worldwide. It creates a race to the bottom inside the garden, but makes them weak outside the border. They also makes prices increasefor the local buyers. Costs get passed along, it’s not as if manufacturers are going to absorb increases, they don’t need to. GM, Ford, Chrysler are all going to pass them on (as any domestic manufacturer)

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        They are effectively a tax and are collected by the federal government. One of Trump’s yapping points is to get rid of income tax and use the money from tariffs to replace that lost tax income. This will hurt 90% of people in the US because the amount they will pay in higher product costs due to tariffs will be higher than the cost of the taxes they pay. The wealthy on the other hand won’t have to pay their fair share.

  • Affidavit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    inb4 products that have absolutely no supply chain dependence to China ‘somehow’ increase in price.

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Hey now, the Waltons need some extra cash. Who could even get by on a measly four million dollars a hour in this economy?

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago
      1. It’s Walmart: what item they sell has no connection to China?
      2. It’s important tariffs actually the board not just China
      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        30 days ago

        I think a lot of their food items aren’t from China, and a few random things are even domestic. I think they sell Lodge cast iron pans, which are fully made in America.

        I think his “plan” is a really big tariff on China and a moderate one on every other country?

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          30 days ago

          That’s my understanding as well.

          But, as the original comment suggested, it doesn’t really matter.

          If every other cast iron pan goes up 15% in price, what do you think Lodge will do?

          1. keep their price the same, see modest relative increase in market share with a demand for investment in additional production, knowing full well the tariffs aren’t going to be permanent leaving them over-invested in production whenever they drop the tariffs.

          2. Also raise their prices by 15%, immediately show increased revenue at no additional cost to shareholders next quarter. CEO gets massive bonus.

          • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            29 days ago

            I would imagine production cost for lodge could go up since they source the material from scrap yards and if the cost of iron in general goes up because a percentage of it is imported than the cost of scrap should increase as well.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Lodge doesn’t have shareholders, they’re family owned.

            That comes with its own caveats, but they’re not the same ones you get with publicly traded companies.

          • andallthat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            I agree with you. In addition to what you are saying, if Lodge exports to other countries and these countries fire back with tariffs of their own, there will be increased pressure to raise prices in the US to make up for the loss of revenue abroad. I’m not from the US and don’t know if that is the case for Lodge specifically, but it will surely be the case for a lot of US brands

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          I didn’t know Lodge only used American iron - do you have a link to that somewhere? I tried finding it on Google but couldn’t. It’d be useful to have handy when talking to the “America doesn’t manufacture anything anymore” crowd

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    Trying to speak sense to Americans. You are in for a rude awakening. They will blame the high prices on space lasers.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    It would have been helpful if they made this statement before the election.