• Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    The gun is planted. They just found a crazy guy in order to convince everyone that they actually found the culprit.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve? Or is this a one-and-done thing?

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve?

        More dead CEOs, I guess. I’m down with that.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          I doubt you will be when the costs of everything go up due to all the corporations hiring massive security teams.

          Something that doesn’t seem to occur to so many of you and something most of you have no response to. In fact, the only response I occasionally get is that it’s worth the cost, which seems to go against the whole reason for the assassination in the first place.

          • frostysauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            How much do you think it costs to hire a security detail? I’m pretty sure security for the entire C-suite would be a tiny drop in the bucket for most mega-corporations.

              • Rogue@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                If they could squeeze out an extra dollar then they would already do so. They don’t need to justify it as “increased security costs”.

                  • Rogue@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 days ago

                    please show me.

                    Nah, I’m good. Clearly our opinions differ. It’s of no interest to me to collate a bunch of sources just for you to dismiss in bad faith.

                    Feel free to find sources to support your own argument though if you like.

      • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 days ago

        Not that I’m fully on board with the theory, but you might be surprised how often “solving” a high profile case is placed above actually getting the right man.

        This is a publicity nightmare for the police, and getting someone in custody “achieves” placating the public and key stakeholders.

        Repeating things about this kids views on the Uni-bomber and referring to his writings as a manifesto “achieves” diminishing his status as a folk hero.

        So while I won’t endorse any particular theory until more evidence comes out, it wouldn’t be the first time putting a scapegoat in jail was deemed more important than letting people think the “perp” got away. Even if the hypothetical real shooter kills again, controlling the narrative can be it’s own goal in cases like this.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      I find that kind of unlikely. If they wanted to frame someone just to have a killer, they wouldn’t be talking about a “3D printed ghost gun”, but just use a regular gun. I, for one, haven’t known that it’s possible to 3D print a pretty well working, and silenced, gun. And that might inspire someone - acquiring weapons is the harder part of any such murder, assuming you don’t want to get caught, and the fact that you can get it without anyone knowing about it makes it way easier.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Just yesterday this video of Mike Shake popped in my feed: https://youtu.be/tHzuz09l41U

        Essentially a sniper rifle with compressed air able to propel a 3d-printed bullet at sub-sonic speeds able to break a simulated skull. And it penetrated hard enough to for sure cause major complication for the target. Not to mention that lead slugs can easily be made DIY without much complications and skill. Lead can be melted pretty easily so lol.

        Not much to do besides being able to cut a pipe, make a release mechanism and compile it all with a projectile to shoot. Done is your makeshift weapon.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        They know the guy is a engineer. They came up with the 3D printed gun because it fits with the character, and gives politician an excuse to ban 3D printers all together, “for our safety!”.

        I’m speculating and being a conspiracy theory, but in theory this could make sense. Nobody will ever find out the truth, I’m afraid.

      • selfAwareCoder@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        People misunderstand 3d printed guns. We use mostly normal gun parts bought anywhere, but legally the pistol handle is considered the gun, and the most popular commercial ones have been plastic for decades. So 3d print that glock frame and put a glock slide on it and you’ve got a cheap glock (and outside of like 3 States, that’s totally legal).

        There’s fairly large 3d printing gun communities, mostly because it’s just fun to build things.

        3d printed silencers are much more rare / fragile because those are illegal to make without ATF approval and silencers need to withstand heat and pressure, so the typical plastic can’t withstand prolonged use.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      To my knowledge, he claimed specifically the money in his bag was planted. Specifically they said there was US and foreign cash in his bag. The fact that Luigi is denying the cash but admitting to the gun and manifesto. To me I think he knew he was going down… but I would be far from supprised if the money was planted either to raise it up to 1st degree murder… or while I’m very far from legally qualified… if they could try and claim he was doing a job for an enemy of the US, could they buypass the trial?