• Birdie@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think that’s right. She’s been released on bond to house arrest; the charges still stand.

  • VerbFlow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    You know what? Everyone deserves freedom of speech, and threatening healthcare CEOs is not, in my opinion, a breach of it. There is a huge difference between threatening vulnerable minorities and threatening invulnerable minorities.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Freedom of speech” in US Law means that the government cannot suppress ideas, expressions, or beliefs so long as those ideas or beliefs do not harm specific peoples, nor negatively impact public health and morals, nor negatively impact national security. In some cases, it isn’t allowed to promote harm of protected classes including race, religion, skin color, gender, or disability, but in the USA that often becomes a civil matter.

      If I had my way we’d be even more strict about it: hate speech would be an actual crime and sexual orientations would also be protected classes.

      So a woman quoting a murderer who assassinated an insurance company CEO, directly sending that quote to the insurance company that denied her claim, is not and will never be covered by freedom of speech.

    • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Doesn’t a threat have to be credible? As in you can make a threat if you’d like to but it has to actually be a legitimate threat. This isn’t that.

      Realistically unless someone says this phrase and has google searches of the CEOs home address, this isn’t a credible threat at all.

      • Aeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        You have to make sure you make threats so outlandish that you couldn’t possibly execute them, like “I’m going to grab Trump by the ankle and spin around really fast, and then let go, launching him directly into the sun”

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe if we start a rumor that’s there’s billions of exploitable people on Pluto all the rich CEO’s will race each other there, die like the ones in that shitty submarine and leave us the fuck alone.

          Happy ending.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I saw someone else say this, but I hope they start rounding up the incels on Twitter saying “your body, my choice” as credible rape threats if what this woman said is going to be litigated with such fervor.

          • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            What exactly is it I’m not understanding about the false claim that “rape is not a crime”?

            • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              7 days ago

              The rich aren’t losing money because of rape, so the cops don’t care to investigate it. It was a tongue in cheek joke implying cops only exist to protect the rich when their money is at risk. Another comment in this thread pointed out that women are regularly told “there’s nothing we can do” when they go to the police because an abusive boyfriend threatened to hurt them. They’re pointing out the special privilege cops give to the rich

              • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Which is complete bullshit. Men are getting arrested daily on the basis of mere accusation of rape having happened. It’s illegal and it’s one of the most strongly enforced laws there is. This was the case before me-too and especially is the case since.

                Exhibit A: P. Diddy.

                • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Unfortunately in way too many cases judges tend to side with the rapist because they’re relatable… See rapist Brock Allen Turner. That happens A LOT. that’s just the one that was publicized.

                  I personally know two people this happened to. The person who raped them got a slap on the wrist. One victim was a man, the other a woman. Ask around and I’m sure there are innumerable similar stories just like healthcare denials.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Did she say she was running for the presidency? Because in that case, she could take someone out on main street and she could grab them by the pussy too and nobody would say anything.

    She should have tried to purchase a president or maybe purchase the presidency itself for a self pardon.

    Joe should pardon her wtf Joe!

  • WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Of course she doesn’t, but the ruling class needs to make an example of someone - they’re not about to let us peasants get away with defying them.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The thing about Jury Nullification is that you have to make it through the majority of a trial. 97-98% of criminal cases (in the U.S.) end in a plea deal without ever going to trial.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure, but that’s on them. Taking a deal is always in the hands of the defendant. But if it looks like public opinion is on their side and the concept of jury Nullification has become common knowledge, that might be enough to substantially swing what’s offered in those plea deals. Prosecutor might be generous to avoid the jury letting them off Scott free.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    This reminds me of Minority Report. Arrested by the pre-crime unit.

    Guilty without the crime actually being committed.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      If her crime is threatening then that actually is what she did, in the past.

      The punishment of 15 years is just way over the top

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s not what she did. There are legal standards for what constitutes a threat, and what she said isn’t one.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        When the court decides that IS the people deciding, judges are a public office and the jury is literally just a group of people who have to make a unanimous decision. You dropped your red star.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not a communist or whatever, dummy. The people decide, dummy. The court is an arranged meeting place for those people to inform the judge of their consensus opinion, dummy.

          You dropped your clown wig, dummy.