A lot of subreddits are banning/proposing to ban X links in response to Führer Elon’s wonderful gesture of love and tolerance. Should this instance follow suit?

Also, Instagram/Threads/Meta links. Same question.

  • xelar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 个月前

    Do you think Lemmy should act like Meta, which banned Pixelfed links and Mastodon instances?

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 个月前

      Logic like this is like refusing to use violence against colonizers because your colonizer uses violence.

      Tactics cannot be evaluated solely on the basis of whether your opponent uses them. Banning certain sources robs them of a little bit more reach and that’s a good thing if you’re talking about an explicitly fascist platform. I think either screenshots or archive links should be the only time x posts are allowed.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 个月前

    Wasn’t Lemmy supposed to be for free speech/anti-censorship and shit? Or maybe I got it wrong? Yall do realize there are many reasonable things on X and not just the right-wing/Elon stuff. Right?

  • krash@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 个月前

    I’d be more than happy to see all links pointing to xitter banned. FB/Meta would be nice too, but I think it’s more important to sending a clear signal on neo-nazi salutes being a red line.

        • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 个月前

          Was presented with this question. Lets simplify it and remove the spin.

          Are you ok with your enemy using the software you've published?

          I quickly answered, yes! It's open source. This must include enemies

          Similar to free speech, censorship aside, if not willing to defend essholes being essholes then don’t really have free speech

          Linus Torvalds slipped, tossing Russian maintainers. Politicizing open source makes it open for some, but not for others.

          Which is a real dilemma cuz i hate everyone equally

          To answer your question, the fediverse welcomes Nazi fascists commis gays whatever running instances. If don’t like the instance moderators can always jump on another instance. And instances owners do not federate with instances they don’t like.

          … and the world goes on just fine

    • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      You could just go on X if you feel like it, no ones stopping you. I dont know why anyones surprised a ‘ML’ website doesnt want to host content by the literal richest person on the planet who just seig heiled on a TV multiple times.

  • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 个月前

    Yes… we should probably ban Xitter links… but maybe allow other front ends? You know, because screenshots can be forged.

  • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 个月前

    If you dont like X posts, you can not open X links. But dont make others unable to view it if they want

    • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      i respect your opinion, your right to have an opinion, glad you shared your opinion, glad to read opposing opinions, Glad your opinion was not suppressed or censored or shadow banned, that someone having purchased access doesn’t drown out your opinion, and others refrained from ganging up to suppress the opposing view.

      Sometimes in echo chambers the opposing opinion turns out to be right.

      This is not one of those cases. <-- my opinion position

      But i really liked that you posted and the opposing opinion was given a fair access to eye balls

      • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        I said that if you dont agree with something, thats ok but dont take it away from other people. You said that same thing, but also that im wrong. Thats interesting

          • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 个月前

            I just pointed that its interesting that you agreed with me and said that i was wrong at the same time. Really dont care if you agree or not

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 个月前

    Yes. Ban it. No more traffic to big social media. If something is newsworthy there will be a blog post about it.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 个月前

      It’s why Soviet WW2 veterans who had served on the Western front were sent to the GULAG.

      This American defector seems to have gotten by a lot better than he would have if he’d stayed loyal to America. Says he spent a few days in a cell but I don’t recall mention of any gulag.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 个月前

    Yes, PLEASE! Even without the whole Sieg Heil debacle Twitter is ass to use if you’re not a registered user. Same with Meta & co.