flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoTrump Justice Department says it has fired employees involved in prosecutions of the presidentapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1708arrow-down18
arrow-up1700arrow-down1external-linkTrump Justice Department says it has fired employees involved in prosecutions of the presidentapnews.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square154fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoRight to work means non-union employees can’t be forced to pay dues in a unionized workplace. It has nothing to do with at-will employment, which allows an employer to terminate an employee without cause at any time. The only non-at-will state is Montana.
minus-squareLordCrom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 month agoRight to work means they have the right to fire you for any reason. Sure you can also quit for any reason, but who really needed that?
minus-squareBradleyUffner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNo, that’s “at will” employment. “Right to work” is a completely different thing related to non union members paying into the union.
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month ago Right to work means they have the right to fire you for any reason. It literally and definitively does not, hence my prior post. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law https://www.epi.org/blog/data-show-anti-union-right-to-work-laws-damage-state-economies-as-michigans-repeal-takes-effect-new-hampshire-should-continue-to-reject-right-to-work-legislation/
Right to work means non-union employees can’t be forced to pay dues in a unionized workplace. It has nothing to do with at-will employment, which allows an employer to terminate an employee without cause at any time.
The only non-at-will state is Montana.
Right to work means they have the right to fire you for any reason. Sure you can also quit for any reason, but who really needed that?
No, that’s “at will” employment. “Right to work” is a completely different thing related to non union members paying into the union.
I’ll stand corrected
It literally and definitively does not, hence my prior post.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law
https://www.epi.org/blog/data-show-anti-union-right-to-work-laws-damage-state-economies-as-michigans-repeal-takes-effect-new-hampshire-should-continue-to-reject-right-to-work-legislation/