• hulfpa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now I wish they had an ARM Qualcomm distro. Been hoping for a Linux distro for my Snapdragon X Elite machine. Now Debian had taken a stand for something they will probably be my distro once there is Linux support for my machine!

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Debian already has an ARM version. Do you mean some Qualcomm drivers are missing? There are already Ubuntu ROMs for Android phones, so this shouldn’t be an issue, right?

      • hulfpa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There are ARM distros, yet the SnapDragon X Elite SOC is not yet supported fully. The drivers are a mess. They are progressing, but slowly probably due to the small number of people who would use it.

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Arm is insanely fragmented, every device must be have dedicated drivers and hardcoded specific configuration in the kernel. And sometimes even separate kernel builds. Also Snapdragon X devices are not even fully supported upstream in the most recent kernel yet. Which means they are many years away from being supported in Debian. Unless someone makes a fork of Debian with latest kernel and not yet upstreamed Qualcomm specific patches (which how these “arm distros” are usually made).

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve been working on writing my own forum in C# lately. Meant to look like some places I went on back in 2009-ish

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    The reasoning behind this move is said to be X/Twitter not being in line with Debian’s shared values

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeay, Debian users who also left Twitter/X for similar reasons. I was already on Mastodon and Bluesky but didn’t make a habit out of it. Leaving the bad platform entirely (and having my data archived and searchable) helped a lot.

    Glad to hear they moved on!

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    As it turns out, having an account on a social media platform full of Nazis, violent racists, and child diddlers is not good for business.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      & all the US-based corporate social media… Facebook, Instagram, Threads, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Reddit, Discord, LinkedIn, & GitHub.

      The VC-funded ones too like BlueSky

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        all of the corporate social media tbh. federation is the way out of this cycle.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Nail on the head… it isn’t about one particular service or protocol but the philosophy of federation

      • I’ve managed to ditch every single one of those except LinkedIn. We simply CANNOT get new clients without it. The lockin to that platform is truly terrifying. LinkedIn is a crime against humanity.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Question: how is LinkedIn useful to you?

          For me it’s just a non-stop swarm of recruiters from India who want me to kindly listen to their offer of a job that pays less than I’d make picking up garbage, utter sociopaths dredging up some psychotic hustle culture nonsense, and previous people I’ve worked with/for asking for favors, which of course means free.

          Is it somehow more useful for an actual business?

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Microsoft bought these social media platforms like LinkedIn & GitHub for this very reason. They want you stuck in their ecosystems …then train their proprietary AIs on your communications, then sell it back to you when you were the one that made it.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I still don’t think I understand the full utility of RSS. I guess it’s good for forum communication too?

          Because my first thought was “RSS is cool but first we need human-written content and blogs to come back.”

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think Bluesky can be an exception. I think it’s way better than Mastodon from a UX standpoint. And it’s still open.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          No.

          It costs literally hundreds of thousands of USD per month to run your own node. If it isn’t accessible to the masses, it isn’t revolutionary. De facto centralization due to prohibitively expensive costs is effectively centralization—same reason we should not trust a platform like Matrix.

          Bluesky is just another startup grifting with open washing. It has all the same VC-funded trappings where the history of Twitter will literally just repeat itself—like we didn’t see what happened with it the first time around.

          Mastodon can improve its UX but some of these platforms are rotten to the core. Or also use something on ActivityPub that does have a UX you like since they can all intercommunicate—or XMPP PubSub Social Feed since it has stricter governance to prevent it from getting too messy.

  • markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My town’s subreddit just started a policy to disallow links to X for similar reasons.

    There is a movement to avoid the platform.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If you ask me, this looks like a big possibility, as X/Twitter’s evident bias towards the newly established U.S. government and their favoring of one demographic over the other could have set off Debian’s move.

    That’s just me speculating, though. 🙃

    No, you got it right. I get that you need to cover your ass to avoid a lawsuit, but it’s exactly because a guy who loves the adoration of nazis owns the platform.

  • VandimionDevilChild@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    didn’t even knew they had an account there, good can’t see how twitter could ever be a good fit for Debian values or any person with who care about foss.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Nah, I think I’m cool if Debian doesn’t respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, that section is bad.

      For one, it’s has classic vibe “if you want to keep the nazis out, you’re the one who’s exclusionary”.

      But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform “shutting out a significant portion of [the] community”? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 day ago

        The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don’t have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They’re just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          You don’t even have to go to the website. Every Mastodon feed can be accessed via RSS. You just have to add “.rss” to the end of the URL.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s a super neat trick actually. Why the heck has RSS been losing popularity when it seems to be the only magic protocol you really need to keep up with what you actually care about?

            Oh I just answered my own question: It must be harder to hijack RSS with intrusive ads and clickbait…

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah what the fuck is with that.

      It’s a very twitter centric view of the web. If you’re not on xitter you’re “shutting out a significant portion”.

      The thing is, it’s not simply that Musk has an ideology that is disparate from my own, he has an agenda that is egregiously contrary to the stated values of the Debian project.

      You’d consult with the community over a new logo or blog layout maybe, but on whether to assist Musk in his far right agenda there’s not really any decision to be made honestly.