Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, that shrug you did about how it would be nice if AI didn’t steal art is part of the problem. Shrugging and saying joink doesn’t work when you want to copyright stuff.

    Human learns by assimilating other people work and working it into their own style, yes. That means that the AI is the human in this and the AI owns the artistic works. Since AI does not yet have the right to own copyrights, any works produced by that AI is not copyrightable.

    That is if you accept that AI and humans learn art in the same way. I don’t personally think that is analogous but it doesn’t matter for this discussion.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a reason I said “they should be made to be more ethical” and not just “they should be more ethical”. I know that they aren’t going to do it themselves and I’ll support well-written regulations on them.

      but it doesn’t matter for this discussion.

      Isn’t it what almost your entire comment was about?

      • Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The argument was basically “that is how humans learn too”. I accepted that analogy because it doesn’t change my conclusion that AI can’t be copyrighted. Had the discussion been about something else I wouldn’t have accepted that argument.