He’s just going to get people killed. But that’s ok he doesn’t give a shit anyways, so it’s moot. What are a few thousand dead peasants when we could make big stock number go up?

  • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You have to remember that musk literally, unironically, thinks we’re npcs. He actually genuinely does not think that the masses of poor people are actually people.

    So no, he won’t fucking care.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      You got a little extra negative there.

      Not negativity, you can’t overstate the direness. Just grammar.

      He actually genuinely thinks that the masses of poor people aren’t actually people.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure that level of delusion is comparable to Chris-chan. Which is fitting because if there are two people I want nothing to do with outside of homicide its them. Musk because he is a sub human Anglo African and Chris-Chan because im pretty sure id default to mercy killing them.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          General disconnect from tbe underlying functions of reality. In the case of Chris-Chan its a matter of their mind being scrambled by underlying mental health issues and decades of trolling, in Musks case its moreso a matter of being a rich being corrosive as a baseline and him being so narcissistic and maladaptive also a lot of ketamine.

          Frankly I pity Chris-chan, as for Musk I would revel in his death.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            scrambled by underlying mental health issues and decades of trolling

            Hey wouldn’t it be fun if a large group of people spent twenty years convincing a seriously mentally ill person that they have various girlfriends (and trick them into sending porn to those “girlfriends” - usually teenage boys), that Nintendo wants to make their OC official, and then finally that they are an interdimensional goddess with magical powers that needs to have sex with their mom?

            The “Liquid Chris saga” almost seems innocent in comparison to the later shit - but realizing that they probably believed that there was an imposter who had stolen their girlfriend and that Nintendo had been tricked into making the imposter’s Sonichu series… like that’s really fucked up.

            Like, wtf is that other than a mass psychological torture and bullying campaign? Why did no one at any point intervene?

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              There were attampts at intervention but they largely failed, the fact of the matter is there was and is very little legal framework for this type of shit and what does exist is wholly insufficient.

              Personally I am of the documentarian branch when it co.es to observing lolcows, observe but dont interact. If content dries up then thats generally good. Dont harrass dont bother if theyre doing something illegal collect evidence and hand it over to the police, if the police do nothing then you can break them. Serisouly imagine if folks did to the Zoosadists what they did to Chris-Chan.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    a few *million dead peasants

    and if another nation attacks while we’re dismantling ourselves, a few *tens of million dead peasants.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cool!

    I’ll open up my bakery and sell bread thatbisnhalf saw dust and alteady so old that worms crawl out.

    I’ll sell water that will cure cancer aids and I’ll just hire a few actors to testify to this.

    Man I’m gonna be rich

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      And your cancer cure water can be full of sewage and toxins and that’s just fine with Elon Musk, so long as you’re making a profit.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Side note, Im still not buying this “Worlds richest man” Label.

    I believe that title still belongs to Vladimir Putin. his wealth is not published though. He Robbed a vast nation blind to the point that he is a living god in Russia.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think its less of a master giving orders to a dog dynamic, and More of a “I’ll have mine, you have yours” dynamic.

        I still dont know if they are fucking crazy enough to try it. but this is whats in the back of my mind with this aggressive and jingoistic rhetoric against Canada, the EU, and Ukraine.

        America may have stepped down from the stage of the Free world, and the Free world may very well be finished. but whats left of it still has nuclear weapons.

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      He mostly lives off debt with tesla being the collateral. Of tesla shares tank hes going to get margin called so to speak

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’ve been reading for 20+ years that the real richest in the world are oil barons in the middle east. I believe a few people are projected to have up to a trillion dollars in assets/wealth etc, but they aren’t celebs or post about it via publicly traded organisations etc.

      Who knows though

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I mean the House of Saud is worth over a trillion dollars I believe.

        Putin could also easily have over a trillion dollars in assets, but they’d obviously be hidden. Does he? We’ll never know.

    • cia@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If that’s how Putin got rich, Elon is soon to catch up

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Remember that we’re not allowed to call for violence, but it’s okay when Elon does things like this, because allowing industry to poison whole towns isn’t violence, it’s just capitalism.

    • throwawayainteasy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Sharing the names of Musk’s helpers? Not okay.

      Letting nuclear plants operate in a way that risks big swaths of the country uninhabitable? Totally cool.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This horrible for sure, but it’s worth noting they just made it so there are no on-paper repercussions for industry poisoning people. Poor people in rural areas have been getting poisoned (and/or driven from their homes) all along. Major media and unfortunately even EPA officials (as we saw for East Palestine) seem to just ignore or bury it most of the time, similar to the treatment environmental activists have reported when there’s an oil spill/leak and media don’t want to touch it. Here’s the latest example I’ve heard about recently. (I’m not specifically trying to follow this stuff incidentally, but I’m always interested in who corporate media tend to ignore or treat unfairly.)

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    2 days ago

    From my point of view from the other side of the Atlantic, you guys in the US don’t have enough regulation as it is. There’s only one class of people that benefit from removal of the regulations you do have, and that’s the top 1%. It’s just going to allow them to do all of the following to make more money, at everyone else’s expense.

    1: Treat their employees worse than they already do, AND put them into dangerous situations legally. 2: Cut corners to save money at the expense of safety. Think airlines, airliner manufacturers, car makers, construction. The list here could be endless. 3: Well, finance/banking regulations. That will be a field day for the finance sector I’m sure.

    I mean the list is potentially endless. But the three points above will keep you busy for long enough I reckon.

    No, I don’t really feel safe even this far away. We’re not immune to all of this anywhere in the world.

    • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your list has most of the highlights, but you’re missing 2 really important one: 1. food safety. I guess Americans don’t care what is being sprayed on their vegetables or what diseases their meat might have. And 2. environmental. Burning rivers, even more wildfires, smog in all your cities, toxic waste in your lakes, etc. Don’t think they won’t start polluting like crazy if they can.

      All regulations means ALL regulations; even the ones most people would think are so common sense they don’t expect them to go away. They will. If it makes more money, they’ll get rid of any and all regulations.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I stopped at three when I realised I could be there all day when it comes to regulations that private companies need to adhere to. But I would agree those should have been on my abridged list too.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Number 3 is interesting for me… The finance sector is pretty aware of the need to control stupid risk taking, and the don’t want another GFC, so I guess they’d (broadly) want to keep some of the regulation around that. What else is there? General bad acting and things like excessive fees? That also seems to be a risk driver, in the long term, as it leads to e.g. increased loan defaults… Where do you think the key problems would be?

        Edit: whoops, this was supposed to be in reply to @r00ty@kbin.life

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          What makes you think big finance likes to keep regulation? Someone’s loss is another one’s profit. Some people become very very rich from financial crises.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because market crashes are not good for anyone in the sector… Hence I think the regulations brought in via the FSB in response to the GFC were broadly accepted (though probably with varying degrees of willingness).

            • Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              And? A lot of the big banking execs, and the rest of the billionaire class in general, seem to largely understand that we’re at the theoretical limit of “line goes up”. They’re happy to squeeze the last bit of juice out of the lemon before they retire to some bunker in New Zealand or whatever.

              Long term thinking is dead in much of the corporate world. The focus isn’t on next year, it’s on next quarter if not next week. A market crash would be easily predictable for a lot of financial firms now - they know what to spot, and the housing crash in 08 showed them that they can jump out pretty scot-free no matter what.

              • naught101@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                … seem to largely understand that we’re at the theoretical limit of “line goes up”.

                I’m skeptical of this. I think they are disconnected from a few fairly fundamental realities. Do you have any links that might convince me otherwise?

                The rest of it I agree with, but I don’t know if that’s relevant for their interpretation of market crashes, because I think they see them as internally driven… I might be wrong here though.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never mind that it is a horrible idea:

    They think know they can just “get rid of” regulations.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      But that was the fault of the DEI - the secret shadow government responsible for all things you don’t like.

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s starting with planes, but next he’ll be crashing rockets in your backyard and charge you for the cleanup.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    All this bullshit from someone that never even took a US civics class. And likely has little to no idea of US history.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    My power company fucked up my autopay, they then preceeded to not tell me, then they shut off my power without a note or an in person heads up, leaving it indistinguishable from a regular outage until it was dark and my neighbors lights turned on and their billing department was closed for the night. In February.

    I’m saying this because all this was illegal thanks to regulations. I reported it to the government because it was danger, irresponsible, and a dick move. I think a lot of people think of regulations as stuff like wheelchair ramps and no knowingly giving entire towns cancer, but it’s also shit like this, that you have to tell people that you shut off their power for non-payment and warn them before you do so they don’t have to spend a night eating takeout by candlelight for no reason.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    2 days ago

    Decades upon decades of progress are going to be gone by the end of this.

    We’ll spend the rest of our lives living in a system slowly being rebuilt, if we even get that lucky.

    There goes our futures. And we voted for it.

    Truly a shit nation full of shit people.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of them are just caught in the gears of history. It’s not as if voting was ever mandatory or generally made available to the working class.

      But yes, a nation asleep at the wheel for the most part. It’s such a pity.

    • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You are …and only a handful of people are going to be better off for it. It’s fucking wank, and it’s not just USians that are going to feel the hit, cause many other countries will use you as a blueprint.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, but the libruls made them do this, because woke/dei/crt and the trans. The amount of actual TDS (transphobic derangement syndrome) out there is something to behold.

      The crazies are obsessed with trans and other bullshit that has no impact on their lives (b-roll of migrant caravans, poor people living high on the hog on steak and lobster, etc) that they are completely willing to end democracy over it. Not even fucking kidding. It’s one thing when you see the elites saying democracy is over, it needs to be shunted aside so they can rule, it’s quite another when they have convinced a lot of stupid peasants to say the same kind of shit. As if the peasants’ lives won’t be remarkably worse under what the elites have planned…

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The wounds are too deep for rebuilding, imo. Even if we do get the chance, there’s just not enough Band-Aids, political will, and time in four years for the democrats to repair it. We’re facing the complete implosion of our federal government and its legitimacy along with it.

      • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        The worst part is that there’s not enough of an organized opposition to stop it, or even really slow it down. Neither major political party acts in favor of the people; major news outlets and social networking tools are owned by billionaires; a sizeable chunk of the country is perfectly OK with getting ratfucked so long as José next door gets it worse. We aren’t facing the implosion of the USA into a TechnoFascist Hellscape, we’re LIVING IT.

        • gothic_lemons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Then be the political organization. Call your elected official. Meet with your local advocacy group or non profit. They are organizing you just have to find them.

    • Ghosthacked@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Imagine us growing up at the peak of civilization (1999, per the Matrix) and not knowing it.

      Now we’re going back to the 1800s with robber barons and 20 hour/7day workweeks.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      B-bu-but grandstanding uncommitted Jill Steiners told me not to worry and they’re all the same though!!?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Dude literally parroted the IDF and shut down any actual war crimes investigation. He was very decisive, in the wrong way.

          He bears culpability for Trump winning for two reasons. Because it’s idiotic to expect the key Arab American demographic in Michigan, a key battleground state, to vote for a pro Gaza Genocide party. And because he didn’t know when to get out of the way. He tried to hold on for so long the Democrats couldn’t run a primary or actual campaign.

          Biden’s legacy is death and Trump’s return.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No no no, the culpability is 100% with the American people. They had two options: the dude who agrees with everything the IDF says and does and the dude that goes far beyond the Israeli far right wildest dreams. There was no other option. It was a choice between a bad sandwich and a pile of shit and people focused on how the sandwich age and lack of caviar. Enjoy the shit! Maybe you can have some more at Trump Gaza Resort.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Biden was the right vote over Trump, even on the issue of Gaza. However, it’s fucked up to minimize Biden’s culpability in the Gaza genocide this way. He wasn’t indecisive, he was complicit and was actively involved in helping Israel lie and obfuscate. Maybe we as a country deserve Trump, or maybe we don’t, but Biden and Harris did not deserve to win.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t agree with the last statement.

            There’s “continue with previously agreed weapons shipments to Israel” and there’s “let’s make Gaza a parking lot, invade Greenland, and ship these brown people to Guantanamo, citizens or not”.

            Biden/Harris were not perfect, but they were the proverbial one-eyed person… vs a blind donkey.

            • Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Don’t forget that Trump is also talking about shifting control of Gaza to the US for some godforsaken reason (it’s beachfront property and his real estate mogul friends will make tons of cash building resorts on mass graves and skeletons).

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Context is important to discern meaning. Biden, the person, deserves nothing better than a jail cell. Harris too, on some level, though she’s not as directly complicit. I voted for Harris anyways, because it was worth accepting that grave injustice to keep Trump out of power.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                23 hours ago

                It was worth accepting that grave injustice to prevent and even bigger injustice.

                We warned against Trump not because we dislike the guy, or his hair or his ties, we warned people that Trump would be even worse than whatever they/you disliked about the Biden admin.

                It took him weeks to propose deporting 2M people from their own homeland and building a Trump hotel on the beachfront property left behind.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  Are you just reading every other sentence or something? I voted for Harris. I didn’t need you to tell me to vote for Harris. I’d rather see Harris in prison than the Whitehouse, but I’d rather see Harris in the Whitehouse than Trump.

                  But, if we want to talk about warnings, I warned people like you that preaching at voters was more likely to make them stay home than vote for your candidate. Pointing out why Harris was better than Trump on Gaza was good, but the constant preaching and harassing attitude could easily have lost Harris the election. The fact that it didn’t end with the election is insane. It shows that your motivations were to virtue signal instead of helping Harris win.