As of revision version #85, OpenStreetMap has the following tags for Golfo de México:

  • name:en Gulf of Mexico
  • official_name:en-US Gulf of America
  • thejoker954@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Just like I never called french fries freedom fries, I will never call the gulf of mexico the gulf of america

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    252
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    As an american. I want the option to display it as Gulf of Mexico. Like it’s always been before that fat sack of shit was trying to win points wit hracists to distract them from the hand reaching up their ass to fuck them.

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      So now that is in the hands of the folks who use the OSM data. It’s in a somewhat exotic tag, so by default any map that uses OSM will still show Gulf of Mexico, unless they actively intervene to show Gulf of America. So if you see an OSM based map showing the latter, you know they made that choice consciously.

    • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      As an American and long time OSM contributor, I also vote extremely no on Gulf of America.

      Also no on renaming New Mexico.

  • CritFail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Since Trump is slang for fart in UK, I propose it be re-renamed to Guff of America in his honour. I bet he wouldn’t even notice.

    • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Apparently the family name moving to America was “Trumpf”, so that fits well given its a fart with a little trailing ‘pfff’, likely caused from the subtle loosening of a well used asshole.

  • Vinstaal0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s calles the Gulf of Mexico, people should stop using different names in different languages and use the actual name.

    Like The Netherlands is called The Netherlands and two of it’s provinces are called Holland

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      it’s a tricky question, arguably there are more people on this planet that call countries by their Mandarin name, followed by their Spanish name, followed by their English name, than the name in the native language.

      De Guo > Alemania > Germany > Deutschland for example

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Which is why I’ll never call Turkey “Türkiye”, though they’re free to call themselves that. I don’t see Germany insisting I call it Deutschland, after all.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Let’s rename Montezuma’s Revenge to Trump’s Revenge while we are at it.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 days ago

    For the next four years I also propose renaming en_us to an-us.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 days ago

    To reiterate, GNIS and GNS are only relevant to an appropriately qualified official_name tag, not a name tag, because of the on the ground rule. For this kind of feature, common sense would place a lot of weight on overall common usage, since sending someone to survey the facts “on the ground” would be… difficult.

    Yeah that certainly seems difficult

  • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why is this even being discussed?

    Are they discussing renaming Taiwan to China as well?

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      One way a global index can respect local authority would be for the index to acknowledge that within that territory, there is an official name for things.

      They can also be pragmatic and acknowledge a common local name, the global consensus name, etc.

      In many ways, it’s just a further fragmentation like language.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Taiwan is the island, also known as Formosa, and it is ruled by the Republic of China. Separately, but still part of that state, there’s the autonomous mainland provinces, calling themselves the People’s Republic of China, a rebel faction which somehow steadfastly refuses to declare independence.

      • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Looking at it this way, I’d call the “mainland” part West Taiwan

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Nah West Taiwan is the western half of Taiwan. It’s an island, not a state, just as Denmark is not Jutland, or Spain, or Portugal (fight!) Iberia.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The name itself can’t really change in OSM because it’s based on what someone “on the ground” would see, i.e. street signs, etc.

      Previous OSM naming conflicts have usually been areas of disputed land where some group de-facto controls the land/people and therefore the street signs, and therefore the OSM ‘name’ tag.

      That’s not going to work very well for a big region of mostly international waters between several countries.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Can we poll the community for alternate names that would enrage Trump? If it’s gonna change, let’s have fun with it.

    Gulf of Veganism and Low Cholesterol

    Gulf of Checks and Balances

    Gulf of 34 Felony Counts

    Gulf of Cheetos (let’s get those sweet advertising dollars while we’re at it)

    Gulf of Insecurity

    Kamala-Clinton Gulf

  • I3lackshirts94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    If he is just going to make executive order to change shit he doesn’t like and not follow the law. Who says I have to follow them too? Still the Gulf of Mexico to me! 😂

  • Bojack411@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Hey. Your all blinded by this nothing and elon is getting contracts of money he dismantled from government. Congrats americans. Hope another cou try can put us in our place.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      no doubt it’s all been squirrelled away into crypto. They’ll have fun trying to hold the guy accountable. Oh wait, no, accountability is for the poors.
      Anyway, enjoy the sound of the keys jingling, folks

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s possible to know about this while also knowing that extreme fuckery is occurring. But its not like your average Lemmy user can do anything to stop either.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      What specifically do you think that OSM maintainers should be doing to stop this instead of maintaining OSM?

      Also coup has a p.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      Current U.S. leadership: Our billionaires are gonna be bigger than all the other billionaires in the world put together. (I honestly believe there’s an insecurity motive there: if US billionaires don’t amass significantly more wealth, they won’t be competitive in the billionaire world against outside billionaires.)

      U.S. Democracy: If one dollar = one vote, I guess we should save all that money we have been wasting on elections.

      The real reason for the surge in prosperity of the middle and lower classes after WWII: decimation of the ultra-wealthy throughout the developed world. Remember: the post WWII US income tax on the wealthy was 91% - literal decimation, for those who paid.

      https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/whole-ball-of-tax-historical-income-tax-rates

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Oh, hell yeah. My parents got 4 and 6 year college degrees based off the income of a teacher, hairdresser, mechanic, and night watchman. 100% debt free. Then their parents, who had $0 to their name at the start of WWII, helped my parents again by buying them a starter house. My parents were both school teachers, on that salary they built a new house in a golf course subdivision, new cars every couple of years including a brand new 6 cylinder BMW… Then the 80s came.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        (I honestly believe there’s an insecurity motive there

        Once you have more money than you could reasonably spend in a lifetime, it just becomes another penis measuring contest for insecure manchildren.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I could see myself wanting to own multiple private islands, getting Larry Ellison to sell me Lanai is going to take a lot of money.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      thank you, enlightened one… we are all forgetting every other crazy thing they’re doing and focusing exclusively on map apps….
      we’re all so blind, thank you for helping us see!

  • RxBrad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    Such a weird thing for everyone to fixate on and lose their shit. Let our dumbass en-US selves do whatever “official” dumbass thing we have to with the name.

    Everyone else can leave it what it always was.

    Next time there’s a Democrat U.S. President, the “en-US” term will be changed back to Gulf of Mexico.

    This is stupid.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s true and it’s such a distraction. There is so much worse shit going on right now in the US government. I’m tired of not calling it a coup. It’s a coup. They’re trying to act like the judicial branch doesn’t get to determine what is and isn’t constitutional. So much shit.

      As bad and as cringe as it is for the “Gulf of America” debacle to happen, it’s just genuinely not worth the headspace right now.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’re right. It’s part of a propaganda strategy to trick US media to “discuss” trivial things like this instead of focusing on the real harm the administration is doing.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    11 days ago

    As I explained to Google (from Dan McClellan) _references do not assert from fiat what things are called. A dictionary definition is not an official definition but what a word means or what a thing is called at the moment.

    Most of the world calls it the Golfo de México or in English speaking regions, the Gulf of Mexico. Changing all the maps of the world won’t change this.

    Now granted, a state chooses what to call itself (such as the changing of The Ukraine to simply Ukraine but that is the incorporated entity that is the sovereign nation of Ukraine.

    As the US does not have sovereign control of the Gulf of Mexico, it doesn’t get to declare the name of a region of international waters.

    This whole thing just makes the GOP, MAGA, the Trump administration and by proxy the people of the United States xenophobic and barbaric as hell. It’s not a good look.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      it was never “the ukraine”, russia just called it that because the ukraine was a region to them… like the great plains is to america…

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Russian doesn’t even have definite articles, to them it was always just Ukraine.

        • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Judging from this very polemic article by linguistic anthropologist Kathryn E. Graber, the argument is that a linguistic distinction that exists in Russian (and Ukrainian) is mirrorred in other languages using the definite article. ‘Na Ukraine’ on the one hand literally means ‘on Ukraine’, ‘v Ukraine’ on the other ‘in Ukraine’. Graber goes on to say that ‘In Russian, a person is “na” an unbounded territory, such as a hill, but “v” a bounded territory that is defined politically or institutionally, such as a nation-state.’ She would then probably also argue that the same, in English, goes for names like ‘the Congo’, being named after a river. The claim that this is a Soviet-era practice (if what she means by that is that it arose during the Soviet Union), is simply not true, though. In Google Books you can find plenty of titles with ‘the Ukraine’ from before 1900. The earliest mention I found in English (though I didn’t look very well) was from 1672.

          It anyway strikes me as very performative. You can well argue that language influences the way we view the world (though, I think the way we view the world influences the language we use much more). Even so, there are obviously much bigger (concrete) threats to Ukrainian sovereignty than (to Ukrainians) foreigners using a definite article or not. Thus, it becomes less a matter of protecting sovereignty, and more a matter of simple respect to Ukrainian sensibilities. Ukrainians may take offence at you using the definite article, and you may want to prevent that by not saying ‘the Ukraine’.

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Its just a distraction meant to throw people off the smell of the real crimes they are committing. Call it the gulf of dogshit i dont care

  • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I’m going to be looking for ways to make the name even more Mexican now. Maybe just perfect my Spanish at least for that one phrase. Gwalfo de Meh-hee-co

  • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    How is it the “official name” even for en-US? Trump isn’t the be all and end all of naming things. Every single rational, thinking person in the USA, and many, many people who aren’t so rational (Trump voters), still call it the Gulf of Mexico and always will. Official, my ass.

    The early proposal of alt-name: en-US=Gulf of America seemed the most logical.

    Holy hell, I hate this cursed timeline.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Because the United States Board on Geographic Names now says so, as demanded by Trump by Order No. 3423. They are the government body that defines what places are officially called.

      But unless you are a US federal employee, as Nick Fury once said, “I recognize the council has made a decision, but given that it’s a stupid-ass decision, I’ve elected to ignore it.”