Came across a list of pseudosciences and was fun seeing where im woo woo.

Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human and animal behavior.

Ley Lines

Accupressure/puncture

Ayurveda

Body Memory

Faith healing

Anyway, list too long to read. I guess Im quite the nonscientific woowoomancer. How about you? What pseudoscience do you believe? Also I believe nearly every stone i find was an ancient indian stone. Also manifesting and or prayer to manipulate via subconscious aligning the future. oh and the ability to subconsciously deeply understand animals, know the future, etc

  • chobeat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    While genetic agency is often appropriated by reactionary politics, it’s a quite established scientific perspective.

    • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m guessing “agency” in this case is being used in a way that’s very specific to that area of research and not exactly how people use it in normal conversation?

      • chobeat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s obviously an open topic of debate in philosophy, but genes have agency for some definition of agency.

        In a cybernetic sense, they have agency in the sense that the information within them transforms the world way more than the world affects their information. They are more players than chessboard.

        For people like Dennet, which I’m not necessarily a fan of, you can think of agency (and therefore freedom) as the ability of any unit of matter to prevent its dissolution in the face of threats. Life can be framed as a strategy of DNA to reproduce itself in the face of entropy. That is agency.

    • SoulWager@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Does a grain of sand have agency? Does it want to be caught by a specific size of classification sieve?

      Because that’s exactly the level of agency that drives natural selection.

      • chobeat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Agency is not will though. For sure genes have no will and neither does sand