Summary

Elon Musk’s net worth has dropped by $110.8 billion since its peak in December 2024, largely due to Tesla’s stock decline following Donald Trump’s new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China.

However, his close ties to Trump and influence over government contracts, including Starlink deals, may help him recover.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unpopular opinion:

    “Poorer” is never a word that need be used to describe any economic downturn associated with a billionaire’s finances.

    “Drop in net worth” is great because one can post the pre/post net worth so we can see that they are in no way poor, even if “poorer” is technically a usable word.

    Barring personal disaster, they will never be poor.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I kind of appreciate the juxtaposition of ‘100 billion dollars’ and ‘poor’

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Barring personal disaster, they will never be poor.

      I’m trying to think what personal disaster could possibly happen to render Elon poor. I feel like a new administration could come in, declare him a traitor, cease all his assets, and he still wouldn’t be poor. Once you’ve got that kind of money, I’m sure you have millions squirreled away here and there.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Once you’ve got that kind of money, I’m sure you have millions squirreled away here and there.

        That’s kind of right. He likely has liquid funds stuffed away in all kinds of places, possibly in different currencies on different continents. The only way to put someone like this in the poorhouse is to bankrupt every single one of his investments, while simultaneously freezing all his funds internationally.

        From a finance perspective, a billionaire is a few orders of magnitude beyond “escape velocity” from ever being poor. I think most of us would need a few tens-of-millions USD in cash to even consider achieving such a thing.

        Another way to look at it is that the billions in “net worth” he has accumulated are just ablative armor for real spendable wealth. Consider the move he made with Twitter: the objective was controlling the platform and discourse on it, full stop. Losing tens of billions didn’t matter - it wasn’t real money in the first place (mostly stock) and wasn’t spendable in the conventional sense. DOGE is a similar play in that the kinds of unfair advantages being gained are worth at least what he’s losing.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s not focused on that. He’s helping his bro dismantle the checks and balances so he can make trillions more in government contracts and corporate tax cuts. He’s more focused on robbing the American taxpayers than some dumb little car company.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      My theory is that he’s always known Tesla was massively overvalued and it was only a matter of time before the company’s stock started correcting towards a more realistic value for the amount of profit it actually generates. As such, he needed to take drastic action(s) to find other gold mines for him to exploit to retain his wealth base.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      he largely abandoned tesla since like 2022, i believe. he was focused on getting that 56bn payout by tesla and bounced.

  • witnessbolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    More… more!!! Kylo meme here

    Bankrupt the Nazi traitor. (Not all conservatives are Nazis. I single out Elon specifically)

  • upended@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    He won’t care. He’s got the availability of the US tax funds now.

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    He pretty literally holds the purse of the federal government, so I’m not sure 111 Billion matters much any more.

  • joanwestenberg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tesla is a sinking ship and Musk knows it. It’s incompatible with his personal beliefs and its customer base are the enemy. I think the goal here is to drain as much value as he can, shore up his wealth via other means and abandon the brand entirely - probably while blaming liberals and protestors etc.

      • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        He violated SEC rules when he bought up Twitter stock, I wouldn’t be shocked if he was selling off positions without reporting it. Who’s going to enforce the laws/rules against him?

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lazy articles like this drive me crazy. It’s not “largely due to tariffs.” It started before Trump was even in office! It’s because Musk’s brand is finally toxic enough that no one is buying Teslas anymore.

    Sales are cratering everywhere. Australia down by over 70%. Europe and China down by 50%. US data seems to be somewhere between a 10-30% drop.

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand everyone’s surprise, or disgust, or whatever reaction to Starlink & government relations. Like they should be entirely separate all the time & how dare they benefit each other. Has it ever occurred to anyone that a very strong, US-based & ran, worldwide operated internet would very much be in the favor of the United States?? 🤔 No, just me?

    For years, before you all hated Musk, I have considered Starlink & the US interests to be one in the same. It is only natural that US collaborates with Starlink. I’m relatively confident the US government has worked on, refined Starlink for Musk & Starlink team. I mean why not? I’m also sure there are plenty of strings attached to the monies & tax breaks given, like the US government owns their ass. Wasn’t Starlink access basically used as a weapon at one point in the Russia-Ukraine war? Starlink is shield & weapon, the raw power of the internet, exclusively owned & operated by US government & allies.

    It just always amuses me when people say, “And Starlink is getting deals from the government!”…Yeah? Duh?? With what uses I outlined above, I find it hard to believe they wouldn’t get deals.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This has got to be the dumbest thing I’ve seen written on the internet in a while, and that’s saying something bcz Trump is on the internet.

    • v_krishna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is such an unbelievably bad take.

      First, Musk has always been a tool, a nepo baby, and an asshole. Just because American liberals only recently noticed this doesn’t mean he used to be great.

      Second, this isn’t the case of Starlink being State owned and controlled, it’s the case of the State being Starlink owned and controlled. That’s what was happening in Ukraine and what will continue to happen. If you think for a second that Musk is beholden to anything or anybody I’ve got a rusty polygon ridden death trap to sell you.