• ogeist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not only that, the screenshot in the complaint of writing in the style of an Author is not defendable IMO. If I, a real person, write in JK Rowling style , I’m in no copyright danger.

    Now if I ask the ChatGPT to write pages 1 to 13 and I get the content. Then that is another story.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      @ogeist the point of the screenshot is simply to prove that the AI has clearly been fed the entire work.

      This lawsuit isn’t about output.

      • ogeist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course, this is about the grey area of AI. But how is the copyright infringed? Yes, the AI was fed the book, how is that different if I read the book and began writing in his style, because i have read the book, with my own different story? As in the example given.

        What if the AI was only fed 50% of the books?

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @ogeist The copyright infringement (if any) will be at the point of copying and distributing the book.

          For example if I went out and photocopied this guy’s entire novel and stapled it together and gave it to you, that’s technically copyright infringement.

          Has nothing to do with what you or I write ourselves subsequently except if what we write proves that I must have copied the book and illegally distributed it then that could be evidence.

          Plagiarism is not the only kind of copyright infringement.