cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down17
arrow-up1369arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·21 hours ago until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 hours agoThe idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoMany people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·20 hours agoWith quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.