Automated background removal was also added recently.

      • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        For how relatively well known it is (it’s probably like the next most well known piece of FOSS after Linux and Blender) I can’t believe how bad a piece of software GIMP is.

        • aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope you mean the UX. I think attacking it’s functionality would be unfair. It does everything good and right … technically.

          If the UX is objectively bad or “just” subjectively might be hard to find out. I would assume if there are objective UX mistakes, some contributor might have been able to deal with that by now. But of course it doesn’t change anything if a majority doesn’t like it for subjectice reasons. It’s part of UX design to deal with subjective aspects.

              • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Or color spasecs other than sRGB (8 bits/channel). I’ve a camera that takes 10 bits/channel photos, a monitor that displays 10 bits/channel, etc. But GIMP will just distort the colors because they hard-coded the color space! Can’t edit for print either, no CMYK. GIMP is an image editor for the noughties, not the 2020s.

                Then again, we’re talking about MS Paint here. If Paint fills your needs, GIMP will be fine.

              • aksdb@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not a professional either, but I was also curious and learned:

                It’s a layer of which the properties/filters apply to all layers below. So you can basically try around and manipulate the visible image without having to combine the layers first.

          • Crul@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve been waiting for years for “non-destructive edition” (AKA smart objects). It’s a fundamental feature that I use (almost?) always as a first step. IMHO a lof of professional work is not practical without it.

            They had it on the roadmap (see 2020 archive) for years marked as “No[t started]”. The current roadmap looks more promising with “link layers” marked as WIP and saying it could be available on GIMP 3.0.2.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use Gimp a lot.

          It does its job very well, but that job is not to be an alternative to photoshop.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used GIMP before Photoshop and I still massively prefer GIMP.

          I really think its a case of what you got used to first.