• el_muerte@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why are you excluding the “plain sight rigging?” Beyond gerrymandering, millions of voters were disqualified through ostensibly legal means that likely wouldn’t stand up to legal challenge, but the Democrats were so concerned about taking the high road to pre-empt accusations of “throwing a tantrum” like the right did on January 6 that they just let it all slide.

    https://hartmannreport.com/p/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-c6f

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, for one that’s not new - they’ve been doing that for a long time.

      For two, as an example, where do we get “millions” of voters from? Is it a non-corporate-news blog without citations? My preference is corporate news with citations since that’s going to have the biggest impact.

      • el_muerte@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You could read what I linked; guy lists his own credentials and experience in addition to his sources.

        Still curious why “they’ve been doing that for a long time” is justification for you to just ignore all the unethical voter disenfranchisement occurring, especially considering the unprecedented scale (of which you be aware if you’d read my link).