This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in Australia is available by calling 13 11 14. In the U.S., it is available by calling or texting 988. There is also an online chat at 988lifeline.org
My issue is your position denies the overwhelming presence and patterns of malfeasance shown thus far in this case.
If I found a dead body in the cell of a convicted serial killer, it would not be an unreasonable supposition to draw that the serial killer was involved.
Did you watch the video?
Also last I checked he was not convicted of a crime. I think he’s probably guilty, but this “overwhelming evidence“ and “pattern” portrait you’re painting is pretty cracked. In fact the video does a very good job of talking about your “patterns.”
Again, you should watch it. I’m being very insistent for a reason
You have problems dude.
Firstly: https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-florida-e2a4431f7319afd037023d9a586aa291
He plead guilty to sex trafficking, so we’re past evidence, he wasn’t convicted of a crime because he admitted it openly.
Secondly, I watched the short, I get it, changes very little, especially given the special treatment by prosecutors.
Telling people that they have problems is NOT nice. It’s the only rule here at Beehaw in which you have broken. Take a 7 day vacation.
Ok surely you know I meant Andrew and not Epstein. This is flagrant misrepresentation and you know it. There isn’t a person in the world who doesn’t know what happened to Epstein and I find your attempt to make me sound completely out of the loop like that insulting to the point that it makes me not want to continue having this conversation. You know what you’re doing. Don’t pull bullshit moves to cover your lack of a coherent argument.
If you watched it then you should understand that just because you can draw lines between things doesn’t mean the lines are correct. Human beings are very creative people. We’re very good at coming up with explanations. The veracity of those explanations however is very inconsistent
YOU are the only person bringing Andrew in, I never did that. Re-read using proper comprehension.
Again, you have problems.
…have you forgotten what this post was even about? Reread the headline. This is literally about the Prince Andrew accusation. I get some of you don’t read articles before commenting, but this is ridiculous.