• cricket97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I were to present you evidence of sexually explicit actions happening at a drag show in front of children would you change your mind?

    • Flat Pluto Society@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be immaterial, because that is already illegal and can be enforced using existing laws without resorting to a broad ban of a particular kind of performance art.

      • cricket97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clarifications in law for grey areas are common. It’s very likely people will downplay any sexual activity, as has already happened.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One time, no. Dozens of times, no I wouldn’t change my mind that it’s basically a non-issue, but I might believe that it’s something that actually happens amongst the hundreds of millions of people that exist in my country.

      You can find one example of the most insanely uncommon shit ever and it won’t mean it’s worth talking about for more than 30 seconds per year

      • cricket97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if I found 5 examples? How many do I need before you’ll admit maybe I have a point?

        • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I can go my entire life and see a handful of articles about something happening, I do not think it’s some sort of menace to society. Probably because I don’t have a hatred of the people involved bubbling underneath every thought I have concerning the issue.

          On January 6th alone I received 1000 times more proof I needed that Republicans are fucked up than decades have given me about trans people.

          I am confident you’re not canvassing the web with attacks against Republicans

    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. It wouldn’t. Because you’re a prude, and your definition of “sexually explicit actions” is almost certainly over-the-top pearl-clutching nonsense to me.

      • cricket97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you say simulating jerking off in front of children is a “sexually explicit action”

        • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t give a fuck about your video of a drag performer in Essex pretending the microphone is a phallus. Prude elsewhere.

          • cricket97@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know you don’t. You don’t care about children being exposed to sexually explicit things. Thanks for being honest about it. But understand that some people do give a fuck, and you should respect that. You don’t even have kids so you don’t really get a seat at this table.

                • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I have a kid, and I have taken my kid to Pride events, because I am not a prude. I have taken her to drag queen story hours, because its fun. I grew up fundie evangelical and given a choice between corn-fed closeted authoritarian men trying to indoctrinate my kid to believe God’s divine order makes her subserviant to a male/creep into her pants, vs. a drag queen playing on social constructs of sexuality, I’ll take the latter every time.

                  • cricket97@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Alright then I consider you a terrible parent if you don’t care about them being exposed to sexually explicit material at a young age. I’m not religious, so your whining about that does not mean anything to me. I simply believe that parents have an obligation to shield their children from shit like this, and you disagree.

                    given a choice between corn-fed closeted authoritarian men trying to indoctrinate my kid to believe God’s divine order makes her subserviant to a male/creep into her pants, vs. a drag queen playing on social constructs of sexuality,

                    Those aren’t the only two options. You can do neither. Not sure what kind of point you are making. Question, should children be allowed to look at porn?