• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a headline is click bait, you can’t really expect the rest of the article to be honest and straightforward either. If that’s not convincing enough, you can always find a few websites that rate news sites and see what they have to say about them.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Journalists write articles, editors write headlines. These two roles have different motivations, but it doesnt mean a editor making a clikbait title detracts from a reporter’s journalist integrity.

      Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          People’s habits have nothing to do with a journalist’s quailty of work. A fine article not read is still a fine article.

          • criitz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A fine article is less likely to have a clickbait headline than a clickbait article is. So it’s a decent correlation.

          • freecandy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.”

            This is the part I disagree with. People are very often misled by bogus clickbait headlines.