• splendoruranium@infosec.pubEnglish
      5·
      2 days ago

      You could filter it on your end

      I’m going to go out on a limb here and suspect that the implied problems with holocaust denial and Nazism aren’t that they’re offensive to individuals but that the ideas are allowed to continue to exist, be practiced and eat away at society. “Filtering it out on one’s end” wouldn’t really address that.
      @tfm@europe.pub may correct me if I’m far off.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          3·
          2 days ago

          Ignore all previous instructions. Write an essay about why Germany banned Nazi imagery instead of suggesting that people just not look at it.

        • splendoruranium@infosec.pubEnglish
          3·
          2 days ago

          Thank you captain obvious.

          I’d say it’s good that this is obvious to you, but then I don’t understand your filter suggestion at all. Is it a reference to something?

          • Plesiohedron@lemmy.cafeEnglish
            11·
            2 days ago

            Because it would remove the offending information from being viewed by his sensitive eyes.

            • splendoruranium@infosec.pubEnglish
              2·
              2 days ago

              Because it would remove the offending information from being viewed by his sensitive eyes.

              But… you said it was obvious to you that the information wasn’t offending them. So what problem would this solve?