My Previous Post (Read it first, as this post might not make sense to you, without reading the previous post first)

I saw a lot of people defending Ars Technica in my previous post. Here is a simple proof that they are an evil company:

ProPublica Posts:

Ars Technica post:

As it can be seen here, the original source of the info/Investigation was Propublica and even in terms of the story cover photo, Propublica used a custom cover.

Yet, despite all of that, as expected Reddit manipulated upvotes to boost the Ars Technica story and even deleted the second ProPublica story from Reddit.

Journalism will be fucked up, because of Condé Nast and their parent company manipulation.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not seeing the evidence that you are claiming.

    There are many reasons that unpaid volunteer mods delete content, including reposts, issues with the OP, etc.

    • Pro@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      ProPublica used Original custom made cover photo+ they did the whole investigation.

      Ars Technica used stock photo and paraphrased some of the info.

      Despite that, the undeleted ProPublica post got about 80 Upvotes in 3 hours. The Ars Technica one got about 120 in about 50 mins.

      As I said before: The Ars Technica post is expected to hit the front page, while the ProPublica ones are expected to die, despite being the original source of the info.