• dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 days ago

    I said in a previous article that this is great, but we should be adopting JPEG-XL as it is current and can now compress pixel-perfect / lossless images better than old PNG. IIRC this revision of the spec doesn’t improve compression yet but it’s coming.

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Not seeing how this would affect uptake. Lossless is great for production images, but standard JPEG will do (at low compression) for most Web use cases. Until OS developers coalesce around PNG as a standard (Windows has for screenshots), this is that old standards xkcd.

    Alpha channels are nice and all, but how many end users A) have a need for that and B) understand the underlying concept, let alone implementation?

    • Melody Fwygon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 days ago

      Alpha channels are critical. The ability to have images have transparency in them is much more useful than you believe it is. Many end users have a need for it, more than they know they do; so this argument really isn’t doing much for your stance supporting PNG. Similarly PNG has supported alpha channels for quite a while.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        For production, yes. What percentage of images produced are for production, though? I know damn well how important alpha channels are, but for posting something on social media, which is orders of magnitude more output than image creation within the context of a larger presentation, no one cares.

        The vast majority of people aren’t graphic artists. That you and I know what alpha channels are has no bearing on daily use by the masses.

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            If you know why you need alpha channels, of course you’re going to save in an appropriate format. But most casual users aren’t going to care. They took a picture of their breakfast or dog and just want to upload now. I’m not arguing PNGs serve no purpose; I’m arguing that most people aren’t Web or app designers. They don’t care whether it’s lossy or lossless, let alone about transparency.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’ll agree for those use cases, but not everyone is making icons, stickers and emoji.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          They are using them, however. They’re visiting websites with them, using apps with them, and so forth.

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            OK, and the kernel is written in C and assembly. Should they know both of those as well?

            • B0rax@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              No, but it should still work. Getting rid of alpha channels would break all of that.