Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoSupreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up1703arrow-down15cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1698arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracyarstechnica.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square178fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·30 days agoISPs already do that here in the states. The court case is to decide whether they should shut off access.
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·30 days agoI believe ISPs do not want to cut people off. All that does is push you to a competitor. They want to be able to hold you liable for damages
minus-squareSabata@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·30 days agoI got one then another, then got a VPN…
minus-squareHiTekRedNek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoI can tell you that Mediacom cable will cut your service off for it, and you have to call in and get scolded before they turn it back on. And, if it happens 3 times, your service is disconnected permanently.
ISPs already do that here in the states. The court case is to decide whether they should shut off access.
I believe ISPs do not want to cut people off. All that does is push you to a competitor. They want to be able to hold you liable for damages
I got one then another, then got a VPN…
I can tell you that Mediacom cable will cut your service off for it, and you have to call in and get scolded before they turn it back on.
And, if it happens 3 times, your service is disconnected permanently.