The main problem with modern civilization is that it’s no longer possible to rob rich people. If Peter Thiel’s money actually physically existed, in like a vault somewhere, SOMEBODY would have burgled the vault by now, purely because of the insanely favorable risk vs reward ratio - like a lottery where the cost of buying tickets of every possible combination costs less than the jackpot, once the reward is high enough, there will always be SOMEONE who will make the necessary investment to negate the risk. And “robbing the rich” would always have enough popular support that there would be little effort to find the thief as long as the oligarch was unpopular enough. But now Thiel’s money no longer physically exists, and it’s basically impossible to forcibly take it from him without basically having to destroy the entire global banking system first in order to get at it.
You’re not wrong, but billionaires are just as easy to kill now as they ever were. If you can’t take the money away from the planet destroying psychopath, take the planet destroying psychopath away from the money.
Killing them doesn’t give you their resources though. If you managed to get away with it, you will have to spend money staying anonymous and some board of directors will use the company value to enrich the next asshole.
You don’t need their money. You need them not to have it. Do it enough times and whoever ends up with it will make more responsible choices with it even if nothing else changes.
This is why we used to let government deal with overgrown wealth. They’re the only ones with the power to stand up to robber barons. It’s too bad that this time they bought the government.
They redistributed it away from us, they can redistribute it back. Democrats decided it’s been 80 or 100 years, so we forgot they were never on our side, **remind them we remember. VOTE. THEM. OUT. PRIMARY. RIOT. **
The main problem with modern civilization is that it’s no longer possible to rob rich people. If Peter Thiel’s money actually physically existed, in like a vault somewhere, SOMEBODY would have burgled the vault by now, purely because of the insanely favorable risk vs reward ratio - like a lottery where the cost of buying tickets of every possible combination costs less than the jackpot, once the reward is high enough, there will always be SOMEONE who will make the necessary investment to negate the risk. And “robbing the rich” would always have enough popular support that there would be little effort to find the thief as long as the oligarch was unpopular enough. But now Thiel’s money no longer physically exists, and it’s basically impossible to forcibly take it from him without basically having to destroy the entire global banking system first in order to get at it.
You’re not wrong, but billionaires are just as easy to kill now as they ever were. If you can’t take the money away from the planet destroying psychopath, take the planet destroying psychopath away from the money.
Killing them doesn’t give you their resources though. If you managed to get away with it, you will have to spend money staying anonymous and some board of directors will use the company value to enrich the next asshole.
You don’t need their money. You need them not to have it. Do it enough times and whoever ends up with it will make more responsible choices with it even if nothing else changes.
I know that, but we’re talking about incentives to rob the rich, which in the best case would include a robinhood style give to the poor.
We’re clearly need to eliminate wealth inequality, but I’m skeptical killing a few billionaires will help.
Then kill them all
deleted by creator
This is why we used to let government deal with overgrown wealth. They’re the only ones with the power to stand up to robber barons. It’s too bad that this time they bought the government.
Fight club style
They redistributed it away from us, they can redistribute it back. Democrats decided it’s been 80 or 100 years, so we forgot they were never on our side, **remind them we remember. VOTE. THEM. OUT. PRIMARY. RIOT. **