• three_trains_in_a_trenchcoat@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    At this point, I think it’s pretty safe to call MAGA a religion, specifically an offshot of American Evangelism. I don’t think you can call its faithful Christians anymore, because while they’re happy to borrow all the trappings and symbols of Christianity, every place where Christ and Trump conflict, Trump wins, including who gets to be Godhead. I’m really not exaggerating, I think a lot of people have walked into an entirely new faith without yet realizing it. If you’re looking for a modern anti-christ, it’s hard to do better than Trump.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The followers of the antichrist will wear the mark of the beast on their foreheads

      The antichrist will appear to be mortally wounded but miraculously survive

      The antichrist is one who is arrogant and boastful, loves making public threats, and is obsessed with winning and being viewed as a conqueror

      The antichrist will be someone who somehow sneaks into power rather than being properly handed it, specifically by colluding with a few powerful people because he does not have the majority on his side

      Someone who will develop a cult of personality, and turn otherwise good people away from what they previously knew as righteous

      Someone who’s rise to power and imperviousness to being stopped will serve as justification of his righteousness to those who have been tricked

      Someone who “will distribute among his followers the plunder and wealth of the rich—something his predecessors had never done”(Daniel 11:24). Obviously were reading “followers” as his wealthiest friends that prop up his position

      He will “try to change the set times and the laws”, “cause deceit to prosper”, and “will greatly honor those who acknowledge him. He will make them rulers over many people and will sell them land at a price.”

      He will wage war on “the kingdom of the south” and target its people.

      He will do everything that he does in service to himself and to the detriment of all those who are suffering:

      There will be a leader over the land who will not help the ones who are dying.

      He will not go looking for the young who got lost, or care for the children.

      He won’t help the ones who are sick or broken, or even give nourishment to the hungry ones who are still healthy.” - Zechariah 11:16-17

      He will be friends with a leader in Israel and “will do as he pleases; no one will be able to stand against him. He will establish himself in the Beautiful Land, and will have the power to destroy it. He will determine to come with the might of his entire kingdom, and make an alliance… then, he will turn his attention to the coastlands.” - (Daniel 11:16-18)

      Literally the only aspect of Trump that doesnt match the biblical description of the antichrist is that the biblical antichrist is ultimately stopped by the courts. And we all know the supreme court isnt doing shit about this one…

      • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        the biblical antichrist is ultimately stopped by the courts.

        Really? I’m interested in more about this. I’m not religious, but these parallels have always interested me, and I’d like to read more about this courts bit.

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I was raised evangelical but am now thoroughly deconstructed. There’s some interesting things here, but keep in mind that all “prophesy” is designed to be interpretive.

          While a lot of the claims of the person above do have scriptural origins, there are a few problems. What I am about to provide is done so for academic purposes, not religious or ideological ones. I do not believe in or endorse religious scripture, but I am bothered by how casually and rampantly it is misrepresented for religious or political gain, as if it isn’t readily available to read in it’s original languages and contexts.

          1. “Antichrist” is a movement/ideology/attitude, not a single person. It literally implies opposition to the teachings of Christ. It’s easy to point out how antichrist attitudes are prolific in this day and age. The very people who claim to carry Jesus legacy are the ones overwhelmingly acting in stark contrast to his commands.
          2. A lot of what gets attributes to “the antichrist” is actually one of several other end-times characters, usually “The Beast” or “The False Prophet.” Many of the scriptures referenced above are about The Beast.
          3. The Beast of Revelation is not defeated by courts, but by Jesus himself during a battle (Rev 19).
          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It could be in a court if jesus beats him in a tennis match. I haven’t read that bit so I don’t know what’s actually supposed to happen.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is 100% correct. Evangelicals Christianity, never a beacon of rationality or clarity of doctrine, has now been fully captured by MAGA. There is no functional difference between Christian Nationalism and Evangelical American Christianity.

      I worry this is only the beginning. I genuinely believe that Evangelicals will also embrace AI and incorporate it into their beliefs somehow. I also believe Trump will be divinized before his term is up - at least within Evangelical Christian Nationalism.