Elon Musk has said an Axios report that the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had concluded there was no evidence of a Jeffrey Epstein client list was the “final straw”.

The report also said the agencies had concluded there was no credible evidence the disgraced financier and pedophile blackmailed high-profile and prominent individuals, and confirmed that surveillance footage showed Epstein had killed himself in prison.

“So… umm… then what is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for?” Musk posted to his X platform, referring to Epstein’s former girlfriend and associate who procured underage girls for him to abuse.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The title of that article should be “Elon Musk Gets His Name In Print Again”

    Because there’s nothing there, really. I’m reading an old book (“old” meaning twenty years which is not old but- ) it has used Newsweek as a source of truth several times. Because there was a time it was considered to be so.

    It is not now. Whoever owns it is playing a bad game of chicken with journalism.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh the list exists, of course. I’m not saying they’re making up things necessarily - just that they’re making “news articles” out of tweets and other low-effort so-called-journalism which wasn’t really the case a long time ago.

        • EisFrei@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No need to single out Newsweek, then, as basically all publications opted for this sort of cheap content to inflate their pages…

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Newsweek, given it’s history and the crass purchasing of the branding is especially egregious.

            business insider, for example, can do what it wants and yeah it’s just regular terrible.

    • BossDj@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If they report on the old things: “this isn’t new news! Stupid media”

      If they don’t, “ugh 24 hour news cycle, they report on it once then forget about it. Stupid media.”

      I’m giving this one a pass if it keeps the files in the limelight and/or pisses off Trump.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes it serves our purposes, sure. It has nothing to do with whether or not the news is “old” or “new”. At least not for me. For the mods of c/news perhaps.