• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Right, so this is really only useful in cases where either it’s vastly easier to verify an answer than posit one, or if a conventional program can verify the result of the AI’s output.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s usually vastly easier to verify an answer than posit one, if you have the patience to do so.

      I’m envisioning a world where multiple AI engines create and check each others’ work… the first thing they need to make work to support that scenario is probably fusion power.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s usually vastly easier to verify an answer than posit one, if you have the patience to do so.

        I usually write 3x the code to test the code itself. Verification is often harder than implementation.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes, but the test code “writes itself” - the path is clear, you just have to fill in the blanks.

          Writing the proper product code in the first place, that’s the valuable challenge.