• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m suggesting that if the abuse is large enough that it swings entire elections, then it should be looked into as a why it’s happening vs saying we shouldn’t do something about voter fraud because something else might happen.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Spousal abuse is only one concern, also parent/child coercion (you’re an adult now, you can’t live in my house unless you vote the way I want). Another would be buying votes, and using the “receipt” to collect payment.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          and then the coercion is simply you give me your number or i hurt you

          there is no way that you can make a system where you are able to validate your vote after the fact, and also is safe from coercion

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Or just say they ran out of paper. Like there are more pros than cons to this system. Nothing is going to be perfect.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That would be nice. Hugely impractical. Especially with today’s government. Pretty sure no fault divorce is going to be revoked soon, so it’ll only get worse.

      Also, was not suggesting that abusive relationships would be enough to swing the election one way or the other, only that this is a valid concern that needs addressed before any sweeping change.