• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    well if you put it together with the epstein files, that might be something

    You do realize I was talking about the epstein files right? Seeing as I said “epstein file” in both sentences that I wrote.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh I see what you’re saying. You’re saying that you posted your comment in the wrong place and that you didn’t actually care about the article mentioned above. Okay, in that case we agree.

      Except even then we don’t agree. If the idea is that they are going to release the files without one name, that means they’re actually going to doctor the files, which makes them totally worthless.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Even if the list had no apparent omissions, how could you verify it wasn’t doctored? Generally, we don’t tend to consider redactions as the same thing as doctoring.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            okay well, when one doctors something generally you’re trying to pass it off as though it’s unmodified. When you redact something, you’re being explicit that something is removed. Make sense?