• RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Proton did not only hand over data to the Swiss courts, but the French courts via that. They didn’t just comply with national laws, but those of other countries.

    That contradicts their virtue signalled interest in privacy, when they’re willing to surrender any data without even putting up a fight. They did not even try to argue in courts against handing over private data. And considering this lead to the arrest of the activist, it either obviously wasn’t encrypted or Proton had the means to decrypt it on their end.

    You can’t just link Proton’s own PR speak as a source to counter that. Of course they would defend themselves.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes they did because most countries have some form of agreement that they share data when legally requested. It is pretty hard to bypass that, but it is duable (Mullaval VPN f.e.)

      They didn’t just surrender the data, they started collecting it at first

      The first link Ecosia showed https://archive.is/2022.04.11-095001/https://www.wired.com/story/protonmail-amends-policy-after-giving-up-activists-data/

      And let me remind you that there is a non-profit above it and they need to handle for the purpose that was created which is still Protons core businesses. They make more money just doing whats right than not because otherwise people would go back to something free or go to Tuta/Mulivad