• RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was not the only way, he could have said no

    There is always a choice, and you won’t understand why making the right one is important until the court cases start

    • anaximander@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t hear what they want to say, then you find out what they’re planning when they start doing it to you. Signing the NDA imposes no obligation to agree or cooperate. There’s nothing to stop you from signing, listening, saying no, and walking away. I don’t know for sure that’s what’s happening, but we also don’t know that it’s not what’s happening.

      Refusing to even talk to them does send a message, I agree, and listening gives them a chance to convince you. Still, I can understand that some would rather take the risk in exchange for a little advance warning of whatever it is.

      • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Listening also gives them a chance to lie, which he then can’t call them out on because the lie happened during an NDA’d meeting