qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up1930arrow-down131
arrow-up1899arrow-down1imageWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square190fedilink
minus-squareSpaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·22 hours agoThat’s the thing, you are still thinking in ipv4 terms, and that’s ok. It’s a different way to think of things using ipv6 and the proper way to configure them. No worries tho. Not like you are being forced to ipv6 for internal home networks.
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·22 hours agoOk, so what would the equivalent be?
minus-squarebubblewrap@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·14 hours agoCreate a new /64 and don’t give it a route to the internet.
That’s the thing, you are still thinking in ipv4 terms, and that’s ok. It’s a different way to think of things using ipv6 and the proper way to configure them. No worries tho. Not like you are being forced to ipv6 for internal home networks.
Ok, so what would the equivalent be?
Create a new /64 and don’t give it a route to the internet.