Well, not a noob, more like an idiot 😂 EDIT: Yes, on the same drive as my Home folder, etc. And yes, technically they’re snapshots, not backups.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is what confuses me about Linux defaults, why would it let them grow that large?

    We can tune logging settings to resonable values for the max size and everything, it just doesn’t come that way for some reason.

    • faerbit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you don’t use archaic technologies it actually does. systemd-journald is limited to max(10% FS size, 4GB) per default.

    • Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well, Linux is also made for servers and super computers, and just imagine it refusing to keep logs because the file’s too large

        • Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          But I think it’s better for it to fail from expected behavior vs unexpected behavior. Your storage being full is very transparent and expected, but that a file reaches max size and starts cutting off is unexpected and would surprise a lot of people.

          I myself use supercomputers and the log files can get into a lot of GB, and I would hate it if it just cut off at some point.

          • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I mean that’s fair, but a supercomputer would be heavily customized so disabling log limits would be part of that if needed.